Alaya Rahm - Testimonies Against Sathya Sai Baba
A Full Inquiry And Analysis
CLICK HERE FOR MAJOR UPDATE:
Public Court Records: Alaya Rahm Self-Dismisses His Own Lawsuit Against The Sathya Sai Baba Society
Update: May 4th 2006

TESTIMONIES FROM ALAYA RAHM

The testimonies of Alaya Rahm ("Sam Young" was an alias used by Alaya) are listed on three primary sites: 1) Divine Downfall, by Mick Brown, October 27th, 2000, in the Daily Telegraph, UK; 2) Seduced, Danish TV Documentary aired January 30th, 2002; and 3) Secret Swami, BBC Documentary aired June 17th, 2004.

ALAYA RAHM'S FIRST EXPERIENCE: CONTRADICTIONS:

In Alaya Rahm's testimony, from Seduced, Alaya Rahm claims that his first personal experience with SSB occurred, when he was 16 years old, when he went to see SSB, alone with some friends in a USA group. His family did not accompany him during this trip. According to Alaya Rahm's testimony, on Seduced, SSB materialized oil and rubbed it on his testicles and kissed him deeply and it seemed as if SSB was trying to make his penis erect [Seduced: 217 00:29:46:24 00:29:53:22].

This testimony directly contradicts the testimony that Alaya Rahm gave in Secret Swami, in which Alaya Rahm said that his first personal experience with SSB was when his family was with him in 1997 [Secret Swami: 10.16.47 & 10.18.38]. According to Alaya Rahm, on Secret Swami, his family was called for an interview (in 1997) and he was called privately. It was then that SSB materialized oil and rubbed it on his testicles and kissed him deeply [Secret Swami: 10.18.51]. After the interview, his father, Al Rahm, asked Alaya what happened in the private interview. Alaya said he could not tell. Al asked if SSB made oil for him. Alaya asked Al how he knew about the oil and Al said that it had happened to him too. Al accepted the experience as some sort of healing ritual [Secret Swami: 10.19.13].

The previous two accounts contradict Alaya Rahm's (alias "Sam Young") testimony, in the Divine Downfall interview, that he had with Mick Brown. According to the Divine Downfall interview, "In 1995, Sam had come to his father. In a private interview, he said, Sai Baba had 'materialised' some oil in his hand, unbuttoned Sam's trousers and rubbed his genitals. Jeff (Al Rahm's alias) told his son he had had a similar experience when he first met Sai Baba at 18. 'I said to Sam, what did you think about it? He said he didn't feel there was anything sexual about it; it was like Sai Baba was doing his job. And I'd kind of had that experience. A doctor gives a boy an exam. I'd taken it as some kind of healing.' Thereafter, Sam said nothing about his experiences". Alaya Rahm makes no mention of SSB kissing him deeply and trying to make his penis erect (as he claimed in Secret Swami and Seduced). As a matter of fact, Alaya Rahm told his father that, "he didn't feel there was anything sexual about it; it was like Sai Baba was doing his job".

ALAYA RAHM'S OILING: CONTRADICTIONS

In the Divine Downfall interview, Alaya Rahm received an oiling from SSB, in 1995, in a trip he took with a family friend (Family did not go with Sam on this trip). After receiving this oiling, Sam Young told his father about it when he returned to the USA (in 1995).

In Seduced, Alaya Rahm received an oiling from SSB, when he was 16 years old, in a trip he took with friends in a USA group (Family did not go with Alaya on this trip). After receiving this oiling, Alaya Rahm told no one, as directed by SSB. Alaya Rahm went back to see SSB, with his family, in 1997. The family was called for an interview. Alaya Rahm was called for a private interview but he does "not remember exactly what happened", but claims that "physical contact" occurred. [Seduced: 217 00:29:46:24 00:29:53:22].

In Secret Swami, Alaya Rahm received an oiling from SSB, in 1997, in a trip he took with his family [Secret Swami: 10.16.47]. In this family interview (in 1997), Alaya Rahm received a private interview and had an oiling. SSB kissed him heavily on the mouth. SSB told him to tell no one. After the interview, his father, Al, asked Alaya what happened in the private interview. Alaya said he could not tell. Al asked if SSB made oil for him. Alaya asked Al how he knew about the oil and Al said that it had happened to him too. Al accepted the experience as some sort of healing ritual [Secret Swami: 10.19.13]. This directly contradicts Alaya Rahm's Seduced account in which he says, of his 1997 family interview, "I don't remember exactly what happened that first day, but I know that there was physical contact in the personal interview room" [Seduced: 217 00:29:46:24 00:29:53:22].

OTHER CONTRADICTIONS

In Alaya Rahm's testimony on Divine Downfall, we have a revelation that Alaya Rahm had received about $10,000 in cash and gifts from SSB. On Secret Swami, Al Rahm said, "I think he gave him several thousands dollars". Al Rahm "thinks" SSB gave Alaya "several thousand dollars"? Why didn't he ask him? Where did this figure of $10,000 come from? Especially in light that the Rahm family claims that the gold watches and diamond rings, that they received from SSB, were cheap and not worth very much money. There is no mention of Alaya receiving any amount of money on Seduced.

Another contradiction occurs between Alaya Rahm's testimony in Divine Downfall and Seduced. In Alaya Rahm's testimony, on Seduced, Alaya Rahm claimed he had conversations with "other people" who had similar experiences. Alaya said he could talk more openly with them than he could with his dad [Seduced: 226 00:36:34:10 00:36:38:15]. However, in Divine Downfall, the "other people" are two American, teenage students at the Puttparthi College. In Divine Downfall, Sam Young said that "we didn't talk about it too much because of the idea that he (SSB) was omniscient, that he'd know what we were talking about and what was in our heads". In Seduced, Alaya Rahm talks to other people (notice he does not specify the important information that they were American, Sai Students) and he talks to them openly [Seduced: 226 00:36:34:10 00:36:38:15]. Yet in the second account, on Divine Downfall, they "didn't talk about it too much". So, did Alaya talk "openly" about it or "not too much"?

The last contradiction is regarding the accounts given in Divine Downfall and Secret Swami about how Alaya Rahm (alias "Sam Young") divulged everything that was happening to his parents. In Divine Downfall, it states, "When Sai Baba attempted to get him to perform oral sex, Sam walked out for the last time, although it would be some months before he summoned the nerve to tell his parents". This same story is repeated in Seduced in which it said that Alaya Rahm told his father [Seduced: 227 00:38:26:03 00:38:29:06]. However, in Secret Swami, Alaya did not tell his parents. His parents confronted him and that was when he divulged the story. In Secret Swami, it says, "Al Rahm: We were concerned about Alaya's behaviour and the way he was acting and so we decided we were going to confront him. Well, to my surprise when Alaya said ok and he started to tell the story, it was so much more than I knew anything about" [Secret Swami: 10.35.20].

THE RAHM FAMILY LETTER: CONTRADICTIONS RECONCILED?

Click Here to view an open letter, from the Rahm Family, that attempts to reconcile Alaya's contradictory testimonies by explaining that the discrepancies were due to poor editing. The implications are that the Secret Swami Documentary, the Seduced Documentary and the Divine Downfall Interview are all inaccurate. The Rahm Family's response also creates a few more additional contradictions.

MORE CONTRADICTIONS SURFACE

Click Here to view a letter from the Rahm Family in which it is claimed that "On one occasion Baba took off his robe and lungi and, fully naked, attempted to pull down Alaya's pants and climb onto his back in an effort to have anal sex". This statement directly contradicts Alaya Rahm's own testimony on Secret Swami where Alaya said, "he lifted his robe and his dhoti up to his chest and showed me the whole bottom half of this body" [Secret Swami: 10.29.46]. The above statement also contradicts Alaya Rahm's own testimony in the Seduced Documentary where Alaya said, "One time he had his robe almost completely off..." [Seduced: 213 00:28:49:09 00:28:55:07]. Going from "almost naked" to "fully naked" is a significant change in details.

The Rahm Family letter also said, "Alaya was singled out and called in for 14 interviews in a period of less than 2 months in front of 20,000 young adults from around the world. 7 of those interviews were with his family but Alaya was also called privately in each of those as well." This means that Alaya received a total of 14 private interviews. However, in the Seduced Documentary, Alaya said, "I ended up getting about 20 to 21 personal interviews within a month and a half" [Seduced: 218 00:31:46:24 00:31:49:21]. In the Divine Downfall interview, it was claimed that the Rahms were called for seven interviews, while Alaya had "some 20 private meetings". Clearly, the number of interviews was exaggerated. Not only that, but during half of these private interviews, the Rahm family were just outside the main interview room, separated by a curtain! In Alaya's interviews (when his family was not present) there were other people that were present in the interview room. Alaya was not specifically called alone for general interviews. These interviews occurred in July and early August of 1997.

Despite SSB allegedly telling Alaya not to tell anyone about the money given to him (ref. Divine Downfall Interview), Al Rahm said that Alaya told him everything about it! Clearly, Alaya did not obey SSB's every command and was not fearful of going against SSB's words of caution. Such being the case, why did Alaya stay mute about the alleged sexual abuse? It is also important to note that Alaya's attitude began to change for the worse once his parents began enforcing the discipline that SSB recommended.

In the Rahm Family letter, Al Rahm said that, "Sai Baba kept calling Alaya his exemplary boy". However, by reading the transcript to the USA Regional Conference (August of 1997) one can see that SSB spent most of his time strictly disciplining Alaya (that Alaya discussed in no uncertain terms) and even called him "lazy", a "mad boy" and a "bad boy". Alaya even discussed (a couple of times) how he felt that SSB was upset with him and how he could live up to the discipline expected of him, from SSB. Consequently, SSB was not always calling Alaya his "exemplary boy". Far from it. Another exaggeration.

MIRACULOUS PHYSICAL TRANSFORMATION ATTRIBUTED TO SSB

At http://home.hetnet.nl/~ex-baba/engels/articles/Paper 'Shiva-Shakti'.html Alexanda Nagel said that Alaya Rahm (alias "Sam Young") claimed that "on two different occasions" SSB turned his penis into a vagina or made his penis disappear and then reappear! Alexandra Nagel says that she personally talked to Alaya Rahm and Alaya Rahm claimed that SSB went from having a vagina to having a penis! Nowhere else do we read this incredible claim, from Alaya, saying that SSB made his penis disappear and then reappear! Why not?

The testimonies of Alaya Rahm are sanitized versions of what Alaya actually encountered with SSB. In Alaya's testimonies, SSB is depicted as a human, with no paranormal powers, who is forcing Alaya into having sex with him. However, factor in the accounts that Alaya Rahm gave to Alexandra Nagel, where SSB literally went from having male genitalia to female genitalia, and things begin to appear very different. Of course, by adding the information that Alaya gave to Alexandra, many would doubt Alaya's testimony. Perhaps that's why it was never mentioned. However, factoring in the miraculous genitalia change, if it were true (and why would Alaya lie about it?), one could most certainly reason that since SSB has the miraculous ability to literally change from one gender to another, his actions, no matter how sexual, cannot be equated with those of a normal human being. This is not making an excuse for what happened to Alaya. It is simply a very valid observation based on the miraculous, physical transformation that Alaya attributed to SSB, but did not discuss in his public testimonies. Some have attributed this "genitalia switch" to SSB being a hermaphrodite. However, if we are to truly believe the accounts made by Alaya, SSB had a fully functional penis as Alaya claimed he saw it.

As a matter of fact, Keith Ord gives a very compelling sexual encounter with SSB that Anti-SSB Sites fail to list in their sexual abuse section. Why? Because Keith Ord talks about Sathya Sai Baba literally morphing his penis into a vagina! Keith Ord specifically said that SSB was not a hermaphrodite, but that SSB literally changed his penis into a vagina. Of course, this claim makes Keith Ord's sexual encounter, with SSB, sound crazy and that is why it is not listed under ExBaba's sexual abuse section. Furthermore, David Bailey accepted Keith Ord's story, but snipped out the "penis turned vagina" section because David Bailey knew it would cast serious doubt on Keith Ord's credibility. If Keith Ord's testimony is seen as being unbelievable (because of the genital switch story), why is Alaya Rahm's not seen as being the same?

U.S.A. REGIONAL CONFERENCE: AUGUST 30th & 31st 1997:
REVEALING TALKS, GIVEN BY THE RAHMS, ABOUT THEIR INTERVIEWS
(AT THE TIME ALAYA WAS ALLEGEDLY MOLESTED)

Alaya Rahm and his parents have claimed that serious incidents of child abuse occurred in July and early August of 1997, during a Youth Conference held at Prasanthi Nilayam and attended by 2,500 delegates from 55 countries and 20,000 youth. This Conference was held from July 16th - 18th, '97. Alaya became an adult in January 1997, six months before the July incidents were alleged to have occurred. I have obtained a copy of Alaya's birth certificate which verifies that Alaya Rahm was born January 8th 1979 at the Cedars Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles, USA. I surmise that "child molestation" spins better than sex between consenting adults. For the record, SSB is 5'2'' tall, was 70 years old in 1997 and weighed around 108 lbs (49 kilos). Alaya Rahm is 6'6'' tall and was height/weight proportional. Many Anti-SSB Activists have often pointed out SSB's frail, physical condition in derisive tones (SSB cracked some bones going back to 1988, often stumbled when he walked and was said to suffer from heart complications). Consequently, SSB was not physically able, or capable, of restraining Alaya (a strong and healthy 18 year old man) or forcing him to participate in sexual acts if Alaya did not cooperate or consent.

I have obtained three, unedited audio tapes of a speaking and musical performance at a U.S.A. Regional Sai Conference presented by 3 members of the Rahm family (Al, Alaya and Marisa) in August 1997, within 2 weeks of their return trip from India (during which time Alaya was allegedly sexually abused). The Rahm's presentation was informative, interactive, sincere and convincing. In their talk they refute by positive declaration virtually every negative accusation that they have made since. The general public that has been exposed to their much later accusations should have an opportunity to know what they had to say about their interviews shortly after they took place.

Other panel members and speakers at the retreat included Victor Kanu, Berneice Mead and Dennis Gerstin, M.D. Victor Kanu has established a free boarding school in Africa. Berneice Mead is involved in teacher training for Education in Human Values in the United States. Dennis Gerstin is a psychiatrist. None of these individuals have ever reported having observed anything in the behavior of Alaya Rahm, which would be in any manner supportive of the accusations, which he was later to make in 1999.

Some may try to argue that Alaya was first sexually abused when he was 16 years old, when he had his first private interview with SSB. However, Alaya never mentioned that SSB kissed him or tried to arouse him (which is clearly sexual) until much later. Despite Alaya and his father discussing graphic details (in a private talk) about the genital oiling, Alaya not only failed to mention anything about SSB kissing him and trying to arouse him, Alaya also said "he didn't feel there was anything sexual about it; it was like Sai Baba was doing his job". Only later did Alaya say that SSB tried to kiss him and arouse him in his first interview in 1995. Alaya changed his story.

The sexual abuse incidents allegedly occurred between July 1997 through December 1998 (minus the one ambiguous encounter in 1995), on 4 different trips. Alaya was admitted into College in 1997 and could have easily made excuses for not going to see SSB during Christmas and summer breaks. As an adult, Alaya chose (and the choice most certainly was his to make) to go see Sathya Sai Baba on all three subsequent trips. This cannot be overemphasized.

The transcript to the August 30th & 31st 1997 U.S.A. Regional Conference provides crucial insights into the interviews that Alaya, and his family, had in July and early August of 1997 (at the time Alaya claimed he was molested). These crucial insights are as follows:

1) (Click Here For Transcript) Alaya wanted to have interviews and made voluntary and willful attempts to get into them. Alaya also expressed great joy (or as Alaya phrased it, "ecstasy") having interviews with SSB. If Alaya was being sexually abused, why would he be so eager to get into interviews with SSB? This is exemplified when Alaya talked about how he carried 2 scarves with him, so no matter which group was called, he could change his scarves and go in for the interview. Alaya talks about how he tried (and succeeded) getting into an interview after forgetting one of his scarves. Alaya said, [Ref #20] "I was like I forgot my scarf. A couple of people didn't have their scarves you know there were 5, 6, 7 people that didn't have their scarf. So I was like, well, I'm in the clear if they get in I'll get in. Baba walks right up and looks at me and I kinda hid myself back in the middle just ducking down and He looks right at me and says 'all U.S.A. delegates?' and I said 'yes Swami,' and He says 'acha acha.' So I thought, 'oh cool, I'm in.' So He opens the door and He lets us all in. We sit down. He closes the door and I've had the privilege of some other interviews so I let everybody sit all up front and I sat in the very the back wall against the corner. He comes right up and He looks at me and He goes 'hey why are you here?' And I said 'Swami I'm a U.S.A. delegate.' And He goes 'Delegate? No, not delegate, other group.' And I said, 'no, Swami I'm a U.S.A. delegate.' And He goes 'where is your scarf?' And I said 'Swami its in the room' and He goes 'Why?' And I said 'I left it' and He goes 'no, this is not your group.' And I said, 'I know but.' He said,'no, other group, family, parents.' I said, 'I know Swami but'. He goes 'Hey, not this group, my group' and He goes " stay, stay'." One will notice that Alaya desperately tried to get into this interview. Despite not having a scarf, he tried hiding himself in the group so he could sneak in undetected! Alaya then pleaded with SSB to be allowed in the interview and was happy when SSB conceded! Is this the behavior of an adult man who claimed that his frail, 70 year-old guru was sexually abusing him? This interview occured towards the very end of July ([Ref #19] "a week and a half after the actual conference").

Alaya talked about an intimate, private interview he had with SSB. Alaya said, [Ref #24] "I got a personal interview in that particular time and Baba was sitting on the chair, and I knelt on the left side of Him, and the left side is the girls side in that room. The right side of His chair but if you're facing Him it's the left side. So I knelt on that side and it seemed like for some reason every time I'm in there I kneel on that side. We'd start talking and He'd say 'move over here, move over here.' So I moved over there, I moved over to the right side and He goes 'no, no sit on Swamiji.' So He's sitting back like this and He said 'sit on Swamiji.' So I said 'o.k.,' so I get up and I sit down right on His lap and He grabs like my shoulder just like this and I'm sitting on Him like I was a little baby sitting on my mom's lap. And you know, He's so small. Both my legs are up over one arm rest and I was leaning back up against the other arm rest sitting right on His lap. And He was holding me like this and patting my legs, 'good boy, good boy.' I felt so awkward and then I was just like why should this feel awkward, you know, I'm sitting on God's lap, and so I just laid my head down on His shoulder and my face is in His hair and He was just stroking my shoulder and I was just in ecstasy, you know." If something of a sexual nature transpired between SSB and Alaya, why would Alaya not be aware of possible sexual perceptions and refrain from talking about the details of this interview? Alaya said he ended up enjoying the intimate experience and said he was in "ecstasy". Alaya obviously discussed the intimate details to his interviews with his parents, and had nothing to hide.

2) (Click Here For Transcript) Alaya, prior to 1997, seemed to have enjoyed great freedom in associating with girls and friends and clearly did not like being disciplined about not speaking to girls and limiting his association with friends. This is evidenced when Alaya said, [Ref #12] "If I would get a personal interview with Swami, He would always ask me "how is your sister, and your mother is o.k. and give this to your mother." He would always talk about my parents and my family and I sometimes I wasn't really up to date on it because I was hanging out with friends from different parts…He wanted me to spend more time with my family, and just always touch base. And He later made, put a lot of emphasis on that was all He wanted me to hang out with was my family and you know not just in India at home too. He's just wanting me to stay home, do service with my family and be home, help out my sisters which sometimes isn't always fun, but I really learned that my parents and my sisters are the biggest part of my life…So it's the same, so I really have lately been staying home a lot more, not going hanging out as much as I used to, because I've really become to understand that it's the most important thing in my life is my family...[Ref #17] So I really focused on just staying home cause I couldn't control it enough so I just stayed where I couldn't see anybody…[Ref #18] I was walking around trying not to talk to as many people as possible… And I was like He was basically like He doesn't want me to talk. You know?…[Ref #12] You know the youth conference was going on. I had friends all over the United States that were there…[Ref #13] He would always look at me and say 'don't talk so much,' you know, especially to girls 'don't talk to girls.'… [Ref #14] And you know I was like, you know, gee, I felt I've been the best I've ever been and He's still scolding. I can't believe He wants me to be impeccable and I can't." It also appears that (prior to 1997) Alaya spent a great deal of time away from his family (with friends) and only after SSB's insistence, did he reluctantly begin to spend more time with his family, literally severing his social life rather abruptly. Alaya's parents said, [Ref #9] "How do we all change and grow with Alaya and his new liberties and we were getting to points where I would say well, Alaya be home at such and such a time. And you sort of just see him just puffing up and saying well, maybe…[Ref #10] Always Alaya too, this was interesting, as if He wanted him to care about her…[Ref #11] And it was so beautiful to see from my perception of how Swami was teaching him how He wanted him to care for his sister. How he wanted him to be in touch with that and care for her. (suggests Alaya did not care for her before)…[Ref #11] Immediately and we finally got the message that He wanted us sitting together… [Ref #6] But He was very specific about the strictness and the straightness of the path that they should follow and hopefully Alaya will share some of it with you later…[Ref #4] He said to Marisa and I, He said, "be strict, very strict" and he was very clear with our children…[Ref #27] Yeah, and He looked at me and He said 'you be strict, be strict with them.' And I said, 'be strict with Alaya and the kids?' He said, 'yes, be strict, very strict.' This information adds credence to the possibility that Alaya lied to escape a life that he did not want. Alaya's discussion about girls and friends clearly shows that he enjoyed their company and disliked changing his "very outgoing" and "flirtatious" lifestyle. Alaya also clearly expresses his strong attractions for women. Alaya said, [Ref #14] "Walking through the canteen. They made a mistake in the canteen when they separated men and women in the Western canteen where the wall is about 5'11" you know five feet 11inches and I can see over it. And I would always tell my friends they should make this wall higher. How do they expect me to be, how I'm supposed to be, I walk through the line with my head turned and they're like well we walk through the line with our heads turned. So there were two or three girls that were kind of looking at me and smiling saying hi and I was really trying my best to say "hi" and just walk on…But there weren't many people around and there was this one girl from Spain who had been looking at me a lot and we'd been making eye contact. And she'd just say hi and I'd just like hi…[Ref #15] He says first a look, then a smile, then you write a note, then you talk, then it leads from there to you know marriage and everything else. But I see her standing, like nobody is around, and she's just standing under this tree. And like she's waiting for someone. And I walk up to her and she's from Spain and I know just barely a little bit of Spanish and so I went up and said "Hola,como esta?" I talked to her for a little bit 10, 15, 20 minutes…[Ref #16] So, um, It wasn't like just innocent like talking to my sister you know. But I thought nobody is looking at me. I was really concerned about that, being that I did get up in front of a lot of people and talk to Swami. It seemed like I was kind of in the heat. People were looking to me to do the right thing all the time. I wasn't always the right person to give an example but so I was always trying to make sure that I wasn't being seen doing anything wrong. So I was looking around, are there any people watching me talk to this girl. Anyway I found out you can't sneak around Baba. So then my conscience kind of set in 'oh gosh what am I doing, I'm talking to this girl and Baba is going to nail me. So we, I, we went and we sang bhajans and I thought we'll reduce this karma you know and we went and sang bhajans for a little bit. And all through bhajans we were looking at each other and I was like, oh my gosh. I can't do this." It is undeniable that Alaya wanted to associate with women and friends. The pressures that "Alaya was not to have any friendships outside of his family. He was to be in school or at home. He was not to speak with or associate with girls in any way. He was only 18 and was to live like this until he was 25 when Sai Baba would perform his marriage to the Craxi girl. Baba insisted on these things openly in our family interviews and told Alaya's mother and I that we were to insist and keep him in line" (ref. Rahm Family Letter) are valid reasons why many think that Alaya lied to escape a life he did not want.

3) (Click Here For Transcript) Sathya Sai Baba, in a family interview, specifically told Alaya and Athena, in front of their parents, [Ref #22] "You can tell mother anything. You can tell father anything. You can tell God anything. These are your only friends." In later years, Alaya claimed that he did not divulge any details about the alleged sexual abuse because SSB told him not to do so. Alaya also said that SSB gave him large sums of money and also directed him not to tell anyone. In the Rahm Family Letter, Al said that Alaya not only told him about the money (that SSB gave to him and forbade him to talk about) but also showed it to him! Clearly, Alaya did not obey SSB's commands and directions. As an adult, Alaya had many opportunities to inquire about SSB's alleged sexual acts and ask for clarification from his parents. After all, Sathya Sai Baba told Alaya that he could "tell anything" to his parents! Al Rahm made the argument that Alaya somehow justified these alleged sexual acts because Alaya believed SSB was God and the experiences must thereby be "spiritual". If Alaya saw these experiences as "spiritual", he would have had no shame in asking for clarification or meaning from his parents. After all, Al Rahm shared his "oiling" experience with Alaya, that he considered a type of "spiritual" healing! If Alaya refused to talk to his parents about these experiences because he knew they were sexual, why did Alaya continue to go see SSB on three more subsequent trips? The truth of the matter is that Alaya never asked for clarification from his parents, Alaya chose to go to India (over and over again) to see SSB, Alaya made every attempt to have interviews with SSB and Alaya (after abruptly severing his social bonds) was becoming socially isolated and was leading a life he clearly did not want.

4) (Click Here For Transcript) Alaya shared his first-hand accounts of miraculous materializations. Alaya said, [Ref #23] "He goes, 'I'll give you a good gift.' And so He starts waving His left hand here up like this and I was sitting there ducking down watching to see what would come out of His hand, and all of a sudden, as He's waving His hand there is this large round yellow object in His hand like a big ball and it was just not there and then there in one second he was just waving and like this. And there was this large yellowish ball and I was like 'wow that is interesting I haven't seen that before'. And He says, 'come here, come here.' So I go up there and He gives it to me and it was this large piece of fruit, probably the size of a grapefruit or a large orange. And it was shaped exactly like a lingam, you know, perfect lingam shape. And it was huge and He has these itty bitty little hands. So watching Him make it was really cool...And I thought, well I'll just eat it so I took a bite and to my surprise it was a plum and it was a delicious ripe plum. And He looks at me and He goes, 'how is it?' And I go, 'Swami its delicious, it's a plum.' 'Yes, very nice plum. Other plums ugly little black and red. This very beautiful, large golden color plum.' And I said 'yes, thank you.' And He goes 'yes, yes.' Like that. So I ate it, and savoring each bite." I have never heard of plums getting that large, and have never seen any kind of golden plum in India. Alaya also related the following experience: [Ref #25] "And I said, 'oh, Swami a necklace.' And He says, 'ah, yes he wants a necklace.' And He looks at everybody, He goes 'do you want Sai Baba locket?' and I said, 'no' And it was kind of interesting you know, I had thoughts does He just kind of carry this stuff around in His pocket inside and then just have it. Cause I've never heard of anybody asking for a specific thing and Him give a specific thing. You know, He just basically gives you what He wants and so I said, 'no I don't want a Sai Baba locket, I want a gold om.' And He goes, 'ah, a gold om.' And so He materialized a necklace with a gold om on it. So I was really impressed, you know. It wasn't like I was trying to pin Him down, but it was a confirmation"! If SSB had these powers, that Alaya attributed to him (and why would Alaya lie about them?), it is undeniable that SSB's actions, no matter how enigmatic, cannot be equated with those of a normal human being. Many Anti-SSB Activists go to great lengths to belittle or rationalize SSB's alleged "miracles" in order to portray SSB as some sort of fraud magician who is full of sexual desire. Anti-SSB Activists have used Alaya as a "poster-child" for their cause, however, they entirely refrain from relating any sort of first-hand, miraculous experiences that Alaya encountered with Sathya Sai Baba. Obviously, these miraculous experiences would undermine Alaya's testimonies and credibility, and that is exactly why Anti-SSB Activists never relate these miraculous experiences, in relation to Alaya Rahm. Now we have a fuller version of Alaya's experiences. Not the one-way and selective testimonies, packaged and targeted to elicit a negative response from the general public.

5) (Click Here For Transcript) In various testimonies, Alaya Claimed that he felt pressured to submit to SSB's sexual advances because SSB threatened him by saying, "if you don't do what I say, your life will be filled with pain and suffering". In Secret Swami, Alaya said, "He would threaten me. I mean I remember him saying; if you don't do what I say your life will be full with pain and suffering. And that's a pretty heavy thing to hear being sixteen and God's telling you do what I say or your life is going to be full of pain and suffering." [Secret Swami: 10.37.12] SSB told Alaya this quote when he was 18, not 16 (as claimed here). In an article entitled "US Indian family accuses Sai Baba of sexual abuse" by By Aditi Khanna, on Asianage.com, Alaya said, "I remember him saying, if you don't do what I say, your life will be filled with pain and suffering". However, in the transcripts, this very same topic was discussed in proper context (a couple of times), and pertained directly to SSB's teachings! Al Rahm said, [Ref #7] "He said to our son, He said to us, "If you follow my rules, if you follow my orders and my teachings, your life will be blessed with happiness and prosperity and goodness. You will have a good name, everything will be good. If you don't, your life will be full of pain and suffering." Marisa said, [Ref #26] "And it was really very strong advice about what was expected, how they should listen to their mother. Alaya will you tell them what He said about if you follow His teachings? [Alaya:] He said if you follow my teachings your future will be great. I will give you a good name, good reputation. He says, If you don't your future will be bad. [Al (Seral) Rahm:] Pain and suffering". This topic was only related in the context of sexual abuse, in Alaya's testimonies. In the transcripts, however, the context is very different. Are we to believe the Rahm's words a couple of weeks after their interviews, when the information and context was fresh in their minds? Or are we to believe Alaya's words a couple of years down the road when the context was changed?

6) (Click Here For Transcript) It was claimed in the Divine Downfall Interview that Alaya had received $10,000 in gifts and cash from SSB. Al Rahm (in the Rahm Family Letter) said, "Alaya said he received $10,000 and I said several thousand dollars. To me several means 3 or more. I don't bother counting it all up. Who cares? So What? It may have been more than $10,000 in cash." Since Al Rahm didn't "bother" to count it all up (meaning that no amount can be accurately given), the amount of gifts and money received was somewhere between $3,000 to possibly more than $10,000! Al Rahm also said that Alaya showed him all of the gifts and money he received from SSB and did not hide the fact that SSB gave it to him. Apparently, SSB did give money to Alaya, but with explanations and instructions. That is why Al Rahm did not suspect or see anything wrong in accepting and spending the money! In the transcripts, SSB makes reference to the Rahm's financial problems. In the discussion of Athena's education, it was said, [Ref #5] "And she (Marisa) said well Swami we will need money for a teacher and Swami said 'I will send money for tuition.'" Al Rahm said, [Ref #21] "Swami had told him (Alaya) to register in this College right near our house, the Community College for one year and He had told him that He would give him a seat in this school." In these examples, SSB was giving money to the Rahm family to possibly meet the education expenses for Athena and Alaya. Al said (in the Rahm Family Letter), "Alaya came out of one interview with a hand full of cash given to him from Sai Baba. There was over $1000 in rupees that Alaya was told to give to his mother to take care of the room, food, saris etc. and there was $3000 in crisp one hundred dollar bills for Alaya." This is the only instance in which Al Rahm cites an example where SSB gave Alaya money. The amount of "$10,000" was tallied by including the speculative prices for gifts given to them by SSB (diamond rings, gold necklaces, gold watches, earrings, silk robes, etc.). However, since Alaya claimed that these diamond rings, goldwatches, gold necklaces, etc. were not worth very much money, the amount of $10,000 was grossly exaggerated. Since Al Rahm refused to divulge how he spent all this money, this information is being withheld. Consequently, the sinister motive of bribery attributed to Sathya Sai Baba (years later), for sexual favors, is suspect.

7) (Click Here For Transcript) In these transcripts, SSB put the Rahm Family in direct contact with Hospital Doctors and the head of the Ashram. All contact with Alaya originated from public darshans, in front of thousands of people, trust members, security officers, VIPs and innumerable other high ranking witnesses. Is this the probable course of conduct for a sexual abuser?

Alaya said, [Ref #12] "If I would get a personal interview with Swami, He would always ask me 'how is your sister, and your mother is o.k. and give this to your mother.' He would always talk about my parents and my family and I sometimes I wasn't really up to date on it because I was hanging out with friends from different parts...So I ended up understanding that He wanted me to spend more time with my family, and just always touch base...He's just wanting me to stay home, do service with my family and be home, help out my sisters which sometimes isn't always fun, but I really learned that my parents and my sisters are the biggest part of my life. And they are the most important part of my life other than God. And Baba told me mother is God, father is God, treat them like God. So it's the same, so I really have lately been staying home a lot more, not going hanging out as much as I used to, because I've really become to understand that it's the most important thing in my life is my family." Again, is this the probable course of conduct for a sexual abuser, i.e., insist that the alleged victim spend more and more time with their family and realize that family is the most important aspect of their life? This type of teaching would preclude secretive behavior and withholding of information from family members. Combine this with SSB's specific instructions to Alaya and Athena about "telling anything" to their parents, and things just don't add up. Alaya even personally asked SSB if his family could move into a room located in the Ashram! Alaya publicly praised SSB's omniscience, love, grace, power, service and God-hood! If SSB was sexually abusing Alaya, one might expect Alaya to refrain from public praise and adulation, be silent and shy or give half-hearted praises about SSB. However, on the transcripts, Alaya gives a whole-hearted endorsement to SSB's divinity, based on his first-hand, miraculous experiences.

8) In the Divine Downfall Interview, the following was said, "It's a curious thing, said Young, but when he first told his friends and fellow devotees he was leaving Sai Baba, he had the sense - 'and I still feel that way' - that Baba was 'standing over my shoulder, saying, 'Good boy, you're doing a good job.'"! Although it is not specified whether Al or Alaya made this comment, it is very disturbing when it was claimed that SSB somehow told Al or Alaya (apparently, through telepathy or hearing voices in their heads) "good boy, you're doing a good job" for making sexual abuse allegations public, against him! This very disturbing comment only serves to fuel valid doubts regarding Alaya's testimonies against Sathya Sai Baba.

21st North & Mid Central Region Conference: May 24th 1998
(Alaya Still Praising SSB, 6 Months Before His Disaffection)

(Click Here For Transcript II) I have obtained one unedited audio tape to the 21st North and Mid Central Regional Sai Conference, that occurred on May 24th 1998, in which Al, Alaya and Marisa were guest speakers. Alaya decided not to see SSB after his December 1998 trip, due to alleged, unremitting sexual advances by SSB. Alaya was still whole-heartedly endorsing and eulogizing SSB as of May 1998, after two trips in which SSB allegedly molested him dozens of times! On this transcript, the Rahms continue to praise SSB as being "sweet", "kind", "omniscient", "divine love", "inspiration" and giving "grace". The Rahms also make references to SSB's God-hood and relate first-hand miraculous experiences (Refs: #1; #2; #6; #9; #10). Alaya wrote a love poem to SSB in which he said (to SSB), "I will never love another", "My Mother, I come from you", "Sai you are so sweet, the love you spread across the world. Sai you are so sweet, glancing patiently with loving eyes. Sai you are everything to me", "Sai you are so sweet, the beauty of your tender feet" and "Your pleasure is my goal" (Refs: #11)! Also, Alaya said that he wanted SSB to pick out his wife. Al Rahm said that Alaya was pressured to marry the Craxi girl. On this transcript, Alaya agreed to have SSB pick out his wife. He was not forced (Refs: #12). This transcript also strongly suggests that SSB gave money to the Rahms to help them financially, as they were having money problems. This would rule out the alleged claim that SSB gave money to Alaya for sexual favors (Refs: #3; #4). Al Rahm talked about he and Marisa noticed that Alaya was unhappy at times. On this transcript, Alaya said he was unhappy due to the discipline that Marissa was trying to force on him (Refs: #8). Al Rahm said that SSB kept calling Alaya his "exemplary boy" and attributed something sinister to this. However, on the transcript, there is an original reference where SSB asked Alaya to be an "exemplary boy", and did not call Alaya his "exemplary boy" (Refs: #5). Alaya also gave a very moving talk where he praised his relationship with his parents, whom he called his "best friends", had "heart disussions with" and with whom he could tell anything because he had "nothing to hide" and was not "ashamed", due to their intimate relationship that was brought about directly by Sathya Sai Baba's influence (Refs: #7)!

A TIME LINE

1995: Alaya's first trip to see SSB: Alaya was 16 years old: Alaya recieved one private interview: Family was not present: Alaya was given a ring and was oiled by SSB. Alaya said he "didn't feel there was anything sexual about it". The alleged "kissing" and "sexual fondling" were added years later.

1997: July to Mid-August 1997: 1st Family Trip: Alaya was 18 years old: Rahm Family received 7 interviews. Alaya called privately in all 7 of these interviews. Alaya received an additional 7 private interviews without family being present. However, in these interviews, when his family was not present, other people were present. Alaya even talked about how David Bailey was present in one of these interviews, when his family was not called. SSB never called Alaya completely alone for a general interview. In the Seduced Documentary, Alaya claimed that there was "physical contact" in the first family interview when he was called privately, but could not remember the details.

1997: August 30th & 31st 1997: The Rahm Family gives a speaking and musical performance at a USA Regional Sai Conference. Presented by Al, Alaya and Marisa, within 2 weeks of their return trip from India when Alaya was allegedly molested.

1997: Christmas 1997: 2nd Trip: Alaya was 18 years old: Rahm Family received more interviews: Divine Downfall said "2-3 interviews". Alaya's Private Interviews: Number Unspecified.

1998: May 24th 1998: Alaya is 19 years old: The Rahm Family speaks at the 21st North & Mid Central Sai Conference, held in St. Louis, MO. Alaya is still whole-heartedly eulogizing SSB despite his later claims to being sexually abused dozens of times on his previous two trips! (Click Here For Transcript II)

1998: Summer 1998: 3rd Trip: Alaya was 19 years old: Rahm Family received more Interviews: Divine Downfall said "2-3 interviews". Alaya's Private Interviews: Number Unspecified. Alaya claimed that SSB tried to rape him. This means that Alaya's pants were off and SSB (then 71 years old and standing 5'2'' tall) had to take off a 6-foot long lungi, hold his robe up on his chest (as described by Alaya) and attempt to force a 6'6'' tall, 19½ year old man to have anal sex with him.

1998: Christmas 1998: 4th Trip: Alaya was 19 years old: More Interviews: Divine Downfall said "2-3 interviews". Alaya's Private Interviews: Number Unspecified. Alaya had his last private interview on this trip. Final Trip made by the Rahms to see SSB. Some have tried to say that SSB was molesting Alaya for 5-7 years. In the Seduced Documentary, Al Rahm said, "The threats, the pressure, the intense responsibility to bring this boy along, to keep him around for seven years as Baba's plaything.". This is a clear example of the exaggerations that the Rahm's have resorted to. The alleged sexual abuse occurred within a time-frame of years, on 4 trips, from July 1997 - December 1998 (1 trip lasting 1½ months and 3 trips lasting a couple of weeks). Where Al Rahm got the figure of "7 years" is beyond me.

1999: Time Frame: Early 1999: Alaya is 20 years old: The Rahm's said that Alaya clearly did not look happy and they felt something was wrong. Nine months later, Alaya makes his sexual abuse allegations against SSB.

1999: June 1999: Conny Larsson defected from Sathya Sai Baba. Mr. Larsson and the Rahm's were very close friends who were going to make a movie together, about SSB. Al Rahm also visited Conny in Sweden. Since Alaya did not make his sexual abuse allegations until September 1999, it is entirely possible that Alaya heard about sexual abuse allegations, against SSB, from Conny Larsson (whom publicly renounced SSB at this time and became an Anti-Sai Activist). Click Here to view a transcript to Mr. Larsson's speeches at the XIII Annual South Central Regional Conference, held in Houston Texas on September 4th – 7th 1998 (just 10 months before Conny defected from SSB).

1999: Time Frame: July/August 1999: Alaya is 20 years old: I have received several independent accounts that Alaya Rahm was actually in Prashanti Nilayam during this time (meaning that Al Rahm's time line is incorrect). What was Alaya Rahm doing in Prashanti Nilayam 1 month prior to making his sexual abuse allegations against SSB? Click Here to view one of these independent accounts from a Polish devotee who said Alaya was still praising SSB during this time frame. Also, the India Today, Divine Downfall and the The Daily Telegraph of London all published articles that claimed Alaya was abused in the summer of 1999 (which corresponds with and verifies this time frame).

1999: Time Frame: September 1999: Alaya is 20 years old: Alaya first confronts his parents about SSB not knowing his best interests in marrying the Craxi woman. Alaya then makes his sexual abuse allegations against SSB (ref. Secret Swami). The Rahms contacted Goldstein in September 1999.

1999: Time Frame: November 1999: Goldstein talked to SSB and told the Rahms, ""I've done what I said I would do. I've kept my word. I spoke to Baba. Baba's response is: 'Swami is pure,' and he said that you would return. My heart and my mind are on Swami. You have to do whatever you have to do." (ref. Secret Swami) Dr. Goldstein has been a Sathya Sai Baba devotee for 30 years. Dr. Goldstein, as a VIP and close associate to SSB, could observe SSB interact with the students and foreigners at a close range. He never saw anything wrong or inappropriate in any of these interactions. Based on his own personal experiences, and the fact that the students and foreigners always seem to be imploring SSB with prayers and showing much devotion, Dr. Goldstein accepted SSB's words. The Rahms had praised SSB, on numerous occasions (Click Here For Transcript), as being selfless, omniscient, only concerned with other's welfare (as exemplified in the case of their daughter), being God, doing only what is good for others, ceaselessly advocating for family and community values and whose love and sweetness "saturated" their hearts and beings completely! Goldstein (like the Rahms) accepted SSB's divinity, yet was scoffed at for not discarding SSB within seconds of hearing Alaya's allegations (like the Rahm's did). The Rahms never attempted to get clarification directly from SSB. They instantaneously dropped SSB, whom they worshipped and adored as God embodied!

2000: Al Rahm using the alias "Jeff Young", Alaya Rahm using the alias "Sam Young" and Marisa Rahm using the alias "Carrie Young" give their first interview, about the alleged sexual abuse, with Mick Brown of the Daily Telegraph, UK. This interview was published on October 27th 2000 under the title Divine Downfall.

2002: Alaya Rahm using the alias "Sam Young" and Al Rahm referred to as "Sam's Father" gave their testimony in the Seduced Documentary on January 30th, 2002.

2004: Al, Marisa and Alaya Rahm give their testimonies (using their real names) on the BBC Documentary, Secret Swami, which aired on June 17th, 2004.

September 2005: Al Rahm wrote an email to Mayor Slay where he purposely misrepresented known facts and tried to mislead Mayor Slay with complete disinformation that he admittedly knew nothing about. Click Here to view my email correspondence with Al Rahm, that I published on the sathyasaibaba2 Yahoo Group, after an Anti-Sai Activist posted Al's email that stated, "The organization is involved in a terrible cover up and is now under a lawsuit." Al told me that Premanand had filed a lawsuit against the Sai Org. This turned out to be a lie. It is very disturbing that Al Rahm would resort to this type of calumny and dishonesty in his letters against Sathya Sai Baba.

April 2006: Alaya Rahm filed a lawsuit against the Sathya Sai Baba Society and self-dismissed his own lawsuit shortly after a deposition was taken from a past friend and confidant of his. Click Here To Read The Full Story.

GO BACK TO TOP OF PAGE

**CLICK HERE TO RETURN TO RAHM MAIN PAGE**


Translate The Text On This Page



El texto del corte y la pasta para traducir - Le texte de coupure et pâte pour traduire.
Schnitt und Pastentext, zu übersetzen. - Il testo di taglio e pasta di tradurre.
O corte e texto de pasta traduzir.

I am in no way associated with the Sai Organization, nor do I belong to any Sai Group/Center. I alone decided to make these pages with no external prompting or guidance. All the material on these pages are the sole and original opinions of me, Gèrald Morèno. Copyright 2004: This page may be duplicated and distributed freely, as long as it is done so in its entirety or you may quote from it as long as you provide a link back to this page and you inform me of the site on which it is being placed. Other uses are prohibited. Please feel free to Contact Me to make suggestions or comments.