Making The Case Against Sanjay Dadlani
Just recently, on the SathyaSaiBaba2 Yahoo Group, Sanjay said about me, "I wonder how much Pro-Sai defenders/devotees/admirers make a year. :-) Joè Morèno is unemployed and leeching off the state, we know that, but how much is the Sai Org paying you to do such a crappy job of defending an indefensible homosexual paedophile?" (Reference) & "Gerald himself is not squeaky-clean either. He has recently been
exposed as a sexual pervert, a possible alcoholic and has a continuing
affiliation with ex-porn stars/Playboy playmates who make "shit and
piss" porn movies. That too, on top of his extremely worrying
fascination for faecal material." (Reference).
It doesn't surprise me that Sanjay has resorted to using his typical gutter tactics of defamation and lies against me. He used these same tactics against Anti-Sai Activists when he was a devotee of SSB, and continues to use them now, as an ex-devotee. Let us look at Sanjay's long & troubled history of chronic and habitual lying and ask yourself if he is believable or honest. This list only reflects the major untruths told by Sanjay. This list is not, by any means, an exhaustive list to the voluminous and smaller lies that Sanjay tells on almost a daily basis:
Anti-Sai Activists (such as Khorramshahgol, O'Clery and Sampath) complained about Dadlani's pathological lying even after he became an Anti-Sai Activist. Hari Sampath said, of Sanjay, "Ignore him, he has a lot of problems, and cannot be consistent or clear thinking. Sanjay also is terribly attention seeking, and habitually posts lies, and later acts pious...The reason he was not getting support was because he was spitting venom against people who were all the time trying to make him realise that sb is a fraud. Because he was calling Said, a victim, a liar, and Sanjay being terribly cheap in his attitude...Sanjay kept taunting Afshin publicly that Afshin was a liar ( and in private conversations with Afshin, professed to be a friend) After 'Sanjay woke up about SB', the first thing he does is CONTINUE to call Afshin and other exposees a liar, and says he is going to 'expose' them. Did you ONCE ask Sanjay why he was calling David Bailey and Tony pedophiles? Sanjay is like a man just saved from drowning, and after having got to safety, turns all his efforts to harm those who were trying to save him from getting drowned, all these months. And your sympathies lie with the 'saved man' and you condemn those who were trying to save him for not 'supporting' the vicious backbiter? From the posts, we can easily see that Sanjay was the one who began calling everyone liars." (References: 01 - 02 - 03)
Afshin Khorramshahgol said, of Sanjay, "He has lied very ruthlessly about Hari, Tony, and myself, among others. And yet he comes back and he is not sorry. What kind of change is that?" (Reference).
Sanjay was also caught requesting Jesus, Biblical and Disney pornography (Reference). When Sanjay was asked why he was requesting such deviant types of pornographic material, he claimed, "I never SENT or RECEIVED any pics! I was doing my JOB for the IWF!". However, the IWF said Sanjay never worked for them! The IWF emailed Lisa and said, "Dear Lisa, The IWF have never employed anyone by the name Sanjay Dadlani. IWF staff carry out proactive work as well as reacting to reports from the public. However this work is only carried out by trained staff on IWF premises. We would never employ or ask anyone to look for illegal content from their private computers, as this is against the law. Please see http://www.iwf.org.uk/hotline/uk_law.html#CHILD for more information regarding the law and our work. Regards, FG Hotline Manager Internet Watch Foundation www.iwf.org.uk"
Sanjay conceded that he did, in fact, lie (Refs: 01; 02; 03; 04; 05). The quotes read, "The fact is that this false confession of mine is not evidence that I viewed/view child porn...I KNOW it was a lie, you stupid fool. What exactly is your point here? It was a STORY that you FELL for"; "But stupid muck-raking pigs that you are, you mailed IWF to get nothing but a confirmation that my story was false when it was patently false in the first place"; "She says i am on record saying I received child porn, but I have already stated ON THE RECORD that
that entire story was a complete fabrication" and "You base your case on my own false confession which is truly laughable".
Yosyx had become so distrusting of Sanjay (due to his ceaseless lies) that Yosyx refused to believe Sanjay when he converted to an Anti-Sai Activist! Yosyx said, of Sanjay, "i suggest (if anyone is interested) to read his early posts, in which the staunch ssb devotee sanjay was attempting to intimidate and frighten those that left his 'divine' idol... 180 degrees turn; now he bites the hand that he used to lick with such a devotion... nevertheless, his half backed opinions were useless then - and are as useless now. what is puzzling is how those he was so insultingly attacking then (like harisampath) alow him back on the list to try his stupid stunts" (Reference).
Sanjay alleged he knew a male informant who claimed that Tony O'Clery and David Bailey were having sex with him. Sanjay also claimed that Tony O'Clery was banned from the Vancouver Sai Center for molestation (Reference). Needless to say, Tony O'Clery denied the allegations and said Sanjay was a "calumnous liar"
Glen Meloy, the champion of Anti-Sai Activists, was not spared Sanjay's venomous attacks. Sanjay said, "Glen Meloy is a disturbed person. I also know a few things about him that are quite distasteful and can potentially ruin his reputation, so I will not go into it here. Needless to say, the guy doesn't really understand much...Too much of hot air." (Reference).
Sanjay also lied about his Yahoo Photo Album (Reference). After I published my comments about Sanjay's requests for Jesus Pornography (in which I provided a screen-capture to Sanjay's "Jesus" folder), his photo album went offline. Sanjay then stated, on SSB2, "Hahahaha, I LOVE the last picture. So having a folder entitled 'Jesus' in my personal Yahoo Photos area means that I have a Jesus porn fetish?..And by the way it's not deleted, it's still there. Don't blame me if Yahoo decide to modify their policies and make Photo folders available to the public only if the Yahoo user has paid for premium access. But you wouldn't care about that do you? You would just like to give people the impression that I 'deleted' the folder because I had 'something to hide', LOL. Your 'research' is beyond hope now" (Reference).
I decided the best way to check out Sanjay's story was to make a Yahoo Photo Album myself. I never paid for "premium access" and I was able to view my photo album immediately (Reference). After being caught in this lie, Sanjay changed his story and claimed, "Joe, earlier today I logged into my killuminati address to check out YOUR claims that my photo folder was not available. I discovered that this was not true as I viewed my album BEFORE and AFTER logging in, and I was able to see my photo folders. I also checked the availability settings and they were set at PUBLIC..." (Reference). Needless to say, I have screen-captures to back up my claim that Sanjay's folder was offline. Sanjay failed to explain how his photo album was visible without paying for "premium access" (which he originally claimed was needed to view it). I guess one does not need "premium access" after all! Yes, my research is "beyond hope". Shortly thereafter Sanjay deactivated his photo album.
Sanjay Dadlani defected from Sathya Sai Baba in May/June 2001. In September 2001 (after becoming an Anti-Sai Activist), Dadlani made the following claims on QuickTopic.com (about a list of names, to Sai students, that were allegedly sexually abused by Sathya Sai Baba):
"The very fact that these three brothers are on this list fills me with laughter. I know this family very well and they are at a loss to explain why their names appear on this fabricated list. These Bharwani brothers who I personally know also verified that many other names on the list are totally false and were NEVER molested or in any way 'intimately conected' with Sai Baba. and I am awaiting the complete list of names (or non-names) from them. I personally believe that on the testimony of the Bharwani brothers that the entire list is fabricated, but in any case if this list is reposted in this or any other forum, I would like it if these three names were struck off from the list, as it has offended the family very much" (Reference).
Reading the above comments, Sanjay explicitly claimed:
1) He knew the Bharwani family "very well".
2) He directly discussed the issue (of their names being on the list) with them - "they are at a loss to explain why their names appear on this fabricated list".
3) He spoke directly to the Bharwani Brothers and they personally denied they were molested by Sathya Sai Baba - "These Bharwani brothers who I personally know also verified that many other names on the list are totally false and were NEVER molested or in any way 'intimately conected' with Sai Baba...I personally believe that on the testimony of the Bharwani brothers that the entire list is fabricated."
However, the following was published on Premanand's response page:
"Sanjay Dadlani left SSB some years ago and has now firmly repudiated that he actually knew that three students were not abused, but fondly believed it then only because he knew some female members of the family" (Reference).
Therefore, NOW Dadlani is claiming: 1) That he did NOT know the Bharwani Brothers "personally" or the Bharwani family "very well", but only knew (allegedly) some female members in the family; 2) That he did NOT speak to the Bharwani Brothers (when he originally claimed he did); 3) That he did NOT obtain their "testimony" (when he originally claimed he did); 4) That the Bharwani Family NEVER expressed any opinion or concern about their names being on the list (when he originally claimed they did), and 5) Dadlani NEVER talked to them directly about it (when he originally claimed he did)!
Consequently, Dadlani either lied when he wrote his comment on QuickTopic.com or is lying now. Either way, Sanjay Dadlani lied.
Sanjay said on his saibabaexosed blog (in Nov. '05), "This year I have successfully completed 12 years as a vegetarian. Even now, close friends and family are still amazed as they remember the shocking change...So while I understand the "addiction" of meat and the reluctance to give it up, I can conclusively state that life is much better and healthy without meat."
On May 30 2004, Dadlani said under his killuminati blog-post "Nu Metal": "Before that, I felt a bit hungry, so I stopped into Quizno's at the Plaza for a quick turkey & guacamole sub. It was nice, but I'm not very keen on these sub things."
On May 25 2004, Dadlani said under his killuminati blog post "Trains Jesus Girls
Sex Rant": "Now I felt a bit hungry. I remembered that there was a lil
restaurant up the Plaza that sold subs. I noticed that Pizza Hut had a £5.49
buffet lunch deal going on, but surprisingly enough I didn't feel like pizza
since I had already decided I wanted a sub...Too bad I fogot how much I hate ham, it was terrible but edible. I decided that I would definitely pick something different next time I went back there."
Sanjay admitted he ate turkey and ham in 2004. However, now Dadlani is trying to
tell us that he has not eaten meat in 12 years.
On December 24 2004, Dadlani said under his killuminati blog post "Blog Revival": "For some reason I just feel like eating some serious meat. I'm in the mood for a juicy lamb shish kebab but I guess I will have to make do with KFC tomorrow if we don't go to that Chinese buffet place. I think I'll warm up some pizza right now".
Sanjay claimed he did not have a problem with drinking and said he only had an "occasional beer" (Reference). Maybe Sanjay does have an "occasional beer", but he more occasionally has whisky and vodka. Sanjay lied about his drinking problem. Sanjay made the following posts on his now deleted killuminati blog (vowels to profane words have been replaced with asterisks: Reference):
It scares me, because I was able to get over it with drink before, but now it seems that the alcohol does not work. So that scares me. If alcohol doesn't work this time, I gotta cut myself?
F*ck, I shocked myself. I used to take bottles of vodka into college and drink it in the computer room as I surfed endlessly. I'm still f*cking surprised as to how no one ever smelt it on me? So now alcohol ain't gonnabe enough to deal with this sh*t? I need to progress to self-harm? What the f*cking F*CK?!?! I'm losing touch with reality. Someone needs to save me. Who? No idea. Who? Someone, who? Mr. Motherf*cker, I pray to be able to survive.
I have absolutely no idea what I wrote last night, as I was seriously blind drunk. That may or may not be a good thing, but the fact that I lost my blog somehow without posting it, and then to try and pen another one when even drunker was a bad idea...F*ck this drunken sh*t... Actually no.. I LOVE mixin drinks... Makes you more drunk than you have a right to be.. ;) In any case, four glasses of whiskey coupled with two bottles of Stella shoud sort you out .. ;)
I lost my bus pass and the money which was in it to buy my ticket for the Motorhead gig. :( So I got as drunk as f*ck, haha.
The woman is so f*cking ugly. She'd make dogs bark at each other. It's just as well I took a bottle of whiskey, I think I might have needed to get seriously drunk before I could get down to some serious sh*t with her.
By this time I was gasping for a drink. I bought a can of shandy. Lame I know, but it was the first thing I saw. One the way home I stopped off at a pub for a pint of Guinness. Just as I was ordering, some rock/gothic chick in a miniskirt and boots walked in and turned out she was the barmaid there. Gave me something cool to look at while I was supping.
Anyway, what's the point of crying about it now? I cry every night as it is, into my glass of whisky. I drink myself half-stupid every night since I got back and read that f*cking 'Dear John' email. I f*cking hate whisky, but that was the only alcoholic thing they drank in Sri Lanka and I developed a taste for it, so there. Beer will only give you a big belly anyway, liquor is where it's at. The hard stuff. Absinthe? Never tried it. Want to? I'd love some. Even though I'll have to f*cking figure out where to get it from and all.
I really shouldn't blog when I'm pissed; the alcohol makes me incoherent and a bad typist and the text becomes incomprehensible. I guess what I was trying to convey was how it always works out like sh*t.
Maybe I should talk about my deepest feelings when I'm pissed drunk, but when am I NOT drunk? I been crying and drinking every night since I got back from SL. And why? F*ck knows, man. I care for this b*tch, I love her more than anything, and she doesn't even realise..And they say the "real person" come sout when drunk, but I dunno how true that is.
So we were gonna meet up at her place while her boyfriend was away for a week. Ain't that smooth? I took a bottle of whisky coz I thought it'd be fun to have a drink as well as put us in the mood and all that. Throwing away your inhibitions and all that sh*t. And frankly, because she's not that much of a looker, I figure I'd need it. Harsh I agree, but hey, that's just the way it goes.
So the other night when I got so drunk that I ended up vomiting in the kitchen sink, after that I kind of realised how I had managed to vomit my pain out. My grief has considerably lessened since then, even though it is still very much there.
Sanjay also mocked SSB's position on women not getting involved in politics. Sanjay tried to portray himself as a progressive thinker who has respect and adoration for women. Sadly, this is not the case. Sanjay lied about his respect and adoration for women. Sanjay had the following to say about women on his now deleted killuminati blog (vowels to profane words have been replaced with asterisks: Reference):
I guess I can just envision myself hooking up with some cute little b*tch and
then messing up her head in the worst way possible, leaving her all f*cked-up
and broken-hearted. That's almost satanic and is something that I could normally
never do, but these days I just don't seem to care.
F*cking b*tches, they owe me something. And every day that passes ain't helping their f*cking case. Oh boy, am I getting madder and madder by the day. Oh boy, am I gonna burn them alive or what? They all f*cking try this sh*t with me. As if I'sm some kinda lame dog or something that'll let it go. Ooh, hell no! I am NOT gonna be letting this sh*t go, especially from f*cking nervous cowards who ain't even got the guts to come and face me.
F*cking women, I decided today that I think all "hot" women f*cking can go f*ck themselves. F*cking snotty b*tches, f*cking little teasers, they can go die. Little b*tches, brought up as sluts. f*cking sh*tty females, my ass. They can go die.
F*cking women, they're all on the same side. No wonder they think differently, they're a totally different species! They reckon all guys are bad and so they must all get in a closed-off group and protect each other. F*cking bollocks. Of course it's ALWAYS the guy's fault, even when they guy hasn't done anything at all except give away their soul. Well f*ck that.
Women as a whole are really starting to piss me off. Why don't they just go and f*ck off? You either get "hot" women who prance about thinking that they're all that and how incredibly lucky you are to even be in their presence, or you get the ugly b*tches whose tongues hang out for you all over the floor.
She can go to hell and she can go f*ck herself. I have better things to do than be distracted by women who haven't a f*cking clue what they want. It's be SO f*cking easy to just get into a no-strings thing with someone, if only I could
find someone. But hey, that'll come with time.
Usually I treat girls like the f*cking sluts that they ARE.
But, in any case, just look at the lame horny sluts that I have after me; there's Redhead Anna, there's Miss PAraguay and so many promiscuous f*ck swho if I'd sleep with I'd probably pick up some unknown STD. So why should I keep crying over HER and miss HER when I have so many f*cking SLUTS to enjoy with?
Sanjay has also been fully exposed for stalking teenagers, mothers and female students and taking pictures up their skirts and under tables and posting it on his streetbitches blog.
Sanjay also lied about Sathya Sai Baba raping a 7 year old child. This story (about a 7 year old child) has since been shown to be completely fabricated (Reference). Sanjay never cared to investigate this story himself. He simply repeated it, like a trained parrot, and went a step further by shamelessly embellishing and lying about the story. Although there was only one reference to one 7 year old child, Sanjay decided to turn the child (singular) into "children" (plural). Sanjay accused SSB of being a "sodomizer of young children" (plural), "raping small kids and murdering people" (plural), "rapes boys as young as three" (plural) and that "seven-year-old kids are being admitted to the hospital for anal reconstruction surgery" (plural)! (Refs: 01 - 02 - 03 - 04). All of these accusations are 100% false! Sanjay is the only person I have heard who accused SSB of raping children "as young as three" and that "seven-year-old kids are being admitted to the hospital for anal reconstruction surgery". Not even one other Anti-Sai Activist has made these claims. Not even one! These lies are unprecedented and trace directly back to the chronic & habitual liar, Sanjay Dadlani.
Sanjay also lied about meeting Aghori Vimalananda (Reference). On the GaudiyaDiscussions site, Sanjay claimed, "1998 - While with this pseudo-guru, I had undertaken an orthodox study of AdvaitavAda philosophy as well as being taught Vama-marga Aghora by Vimalananda for a brief while" (Refs: 01 - 02). The only problem with this claim is that Aghori Vimalananda died when Sanjay was 5 years old in 1983 (15 years prior to the time Sanjay said he spoke to him). This fact was confirmed by Dr. Svoboda, a direct disciple of Vimalananda. Dr. Svoboda said, "One of his fiercest lessons to me was his dying in my arms on December 12, 1983" (Reference).
Despite these facts, Sanjay claimed that he directly spoke to Vimalananda and received "a few personal secret instructions about tantra-sadhana" before Svoboda wrote his books on Vimalananda. Svoboda's first book came out in 1986. Considering that it would have taken at least a year to write this book, Sanjay would have been younger than 7 years old when he allegedly spoke to the Aghori. This would mean that Sanjay was trying to keep his penis erect for "max 30-40 minutes" and learned "sexual tricks" when he was 5-7 years old! Apparently, at that tender age, Sanjay was interested in "a quick lay in the guise of spirituality"! Sanjay also claimed that he "knew sadhus in India who have lived to be over 300 years old".
Sanjay also lied about his involvement with the Hare Krsna Sect and Srila Prabhupada being his Guru (Reference). In one of his responses, Sanjay said, "So I'm a member of the Hare Krishna sect and Srila Prabhupada is my guru? No wonder I laugh at MorOno and his "research", LOL. :-)) I MAY write a reply to Morono's reply soon, sometime when I stop laughing" (Reference).
Needless to say, Sanjay has left a long trail of prostrations and praises for Srila Prabhupada and Srila Gour Govinda Swami on the internet. Sanjay said (using the name "Vaishnava_das108"), "I pray that I may never leave the shelter of my two siksa-gurus, Srila Prabhupada and Srila Gour Govinda Swami. I pray that their words may enter my heart and dispel the darkness of ignorance. I hope one day I may be intelligent enough to understand their instructions and follow them perfectly" (Reference). Therefore, Sanjay did call Srila Prabhupada his "Guru". Both Prabhupada and Gour Govinda are Hare Krsna Acharyas and since Sanjay accepted these Acharyas as his "Sika Gurus" (many years after they died) then he would have accepted their Hare Krsna philosophy as well. Sanjay even started his own Yahoo Group for "Gour Govinda Swami's Disciples & Followers" (meaning he is a disciple/follower).
Click Here to read a post from Sanjay Dadlani (using the name "x_zecutor") where he admitted (twice) that he was a "congregational member" of the Hare Krsna Bhaktivedanta Manor. Sanjay said, "Believe me, I am a congregational member of Bhativedanta Manor, of which he is the Temple President...I am a congregational member of Bhaktivedanta Manor." Sanjay also talked about various religious events that happened at the Hare Krsna Bhaktivedanta Manor, and related these experiences like a devotee, gushing praises and posting pictures (Reference). Therefore, Sanjay has been far from truthful in divulging his association with the Hare Krsna's and his acknowledgement of Srila Prabhupada as his Guru.
So when Sanjay said, "I wonder how much Pro-Sai defenders/devotees/admirers make a year. :-) Joè Morèno is unemployed and leeching off the state, we know that, but how much is the Sai Org paying you to do such a crappy job of defending an indefensible homosexual paedophile?" & "Gerald himself is not squeaky-clean either. He has recently been
exposed as a sexual pervert, a possible alcoholic and has a continuing
affiliation with ex-porn stars/Playboy playmates who make "shit and
piss" porn movies. That too, on top of his extremely worrying
fascination for faecal material." - is he telling the truth and is he believable? I think the answer is axiomatic.