*** Return To Sanjay Dadlani Exposed Main Page ***


Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
sathyasaibaba2 · Sathya Sai Baba - Exploring the Life and Work of India's Famous Guru
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
You can search the group for older messages.

Yahoo! 360°

Keep connected to your friends and family through blogs, photos and more. Create your own 360° page now.

Messages

Messages Help
Up Thread | Message Index | View Source | Unwrap Lines Message 28078 of 45033  < Previous Message  |  Next Message >
  
  
From: dark_knight_9
Date: Tue Feb 4, 2003  7:38 pm
Subject: Re: To Sanjay
dark_knight_9
Offline Offline
--- In sathyasaibaba2@yahoogroups.com, reiniervdsandt <no_reply@y...>
wrote:
> Hi Sanjay,
>
>
> So, X has evidence that you have requested for biblical pics in the
> alt.biblical.sex forum, now I want to know:


She has no evidence of anything. All she has are requests that contains the words "Jesus", "naughty Jesus," and so on. This is hardly proof.

She also has no proof that I received any pictures, and this is hardly surprising since I never received any pictures.

> Maybe you have already answered this question:
>
> 1. Why did you do that for?


Because I wanted to see if child porn or other forms of illegal porn were being transmitted in that group.

> 2. Did you know what you asked? Did you what was meant by biblical?

No. This is why I asked for such pics, so that I could judge for myself if they were porn or innocent pics.

> 3. Did you actually receive or send biblical (or what it may be)
> pictures?

No, I did not receive or send any pictures.

>
> Would you give an honest answer to me? I am not a Court, or a
Judge,
> I just wanted to know this...


That's ok.

>
> I can hardly imagine that you are interested as a customer of
kiddie
> porno, or animal porno, or porno whatsoever...


Definitely not.

> If you have... don't hesitate to answer honestly, you may always
ask
> me any question you have, I will answer honestly too, feel free to
> ask any question you like.


I cannot talk too much about this any longer because I have consulted with my lawyer friends, and they are very interested in bringing legal action against sathyastra and Lisa. It will be a matter of ease to find out their addresses, but I suppose all will be in good time. They have also advised me not to talk too much, and with the advice of my legal friends, I am going to collect ALL the posts on this forum pertaining to this matter so I can see the weaknesses in the arguments, and then I shall hand it over.

> To X,
>
> Ok, you mailed me privately that kiddie porn is not on that forum,
> but that it can obtained trough the forum, the undercover for
> biblical would be kiddie porno, well, I still can't believe that,

So she mailed you privately and ADMITTED that kiddie porn is not there.

Thanks for admitting that, which is what I have been saying all along; that there is NO kiddie porn there and it cannot be obtained either. If it was possible, it would have been shut down long ago by the IWF. Considering that I wrote those posts in 2001, it is easy to say that the forum would not even be existing now.

And she is still under the stupid idea that "biblical" means "kiddie porn," and that she got this hot piece of info from her "intelligence" friend. Well, this "intelligence" friend doesn't seem to be very intelligent indeed, because not even the stupidest man on the face of this earth would make a connection between the words "biblical" and "child porn."

> first I want to know (once more again maybe) if he knew
> what 'biblical' meant when he was asking for it...

Of course I didn't. this is the very reson why I asked for pics in the first place.

>
> Still, ... I think ALL your claims are not thrustworthy enough to
be
> true, since... again, and again... you haven't showed your real
> identity or even a glimpse of it...


I will compile all the posts and hand it over to my legal friends. It may also be posted here, or if not, I will be able to send it to you privately Reinier, and you shall see exactly how many holes we have shot in their argument.

> I am just asking Sanjay openly,
> so that everyone can read it, and after this, it should be CLEAR !

It should be definitely clear now. If it is still unclear, it shall be clear again very soon.



 
  Replies Author Date
28081
Re: To Sanjay
--- In sathyasaibaba2@yahoogroups.com, dark_knight_9 &lt;no_reply@y...&gt; wro...
reiniervdsandt
Offline
Feb 4, 2003
9:55 pm
28098
Re: To Sanjay
... === message truncated === &amp;&amp;&amp;&amp;&amp;&amp;&amp;&amp;&amp;&amp...
Lisa
conscientiou...
Offline Send Email
Feb 5, 2003
12:03 am
28100
Re: To Sanjay
X wrote: Let me clarify what the pervert and his enabler are trying to confuse....
reiniervdsandt
Offline
Feb 5, 2003
12:43 am
28118
Re: To Sanjay
--- In sathyasaibaba2@yahoogroups.com, reiniervdsandt &lt;no_reply@y...&gt; ...
dark_knight_9
Offline
Feb 5, 2003
2:29 am
28149
Read2
--- In sathyasaibaba2@yahoogroups.com, dark_knight_9 &lt;no_reply@y...&gt; wro...
dark_knight_9
Offline
Feb 5, 2003
4:12 am
28167
Da dorky pervert getting hysterical
Observe how he is begging Lisa to cease and desist. And observe how he is floo...
truth_bliss
Offline
Feb 5, 2003
4:49 am
28177
Re: Da dorky pervert getting hysterical ?
--- In sathyasaibaba2@yahoogroups.com, truth_bliss &lt;no_reply@y...&gt; wrote...
dark_knight_9
Offline
Feb 5, 2003
5:03 am
28187
Enough evidence to me...
--- In sathyasaibaba2@yahoogroups.com, dark_knight_9 &lt;no_reply@y...&gt; wro...
reiniervdsandt
Offline
Feb 5, 2003
9:13 am
28194
Re: Enough evidence to me...
Reinier shows his gullibility: &lt;&lt;Hi Sanjay, Ok, this is enough evidence t...
truth_bliss
Offline
Feb 5, 2003
7:46 pm
  
  
Up Thread | Message Index | View Source | Unwrap Lines Message 28078 of 45033  < Previous Message  |  Next Message >

Copyright © 2005 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Copyright/IP Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help