Yahoo! Groups Tips
Did you know...
You can search the group for older
messages.
|
--- In sathyasaibaba2@yahoogroups.com, "conscientiousobjector2000"
<conscientiousobjector2000@y...> wrote:
> --- In sathyasaibaba2@yahoogroups.com, saiexposed420
<no_reply@y...> wrote:=
>
> > --- In
sathyasaibaba2@yahoogroups.com, "conscientiousobjector2000"
> > <conscientiousobjector2000@y...> wrote:
> > > --- In sathyasaibaba2@yahoogroups.com, saiexposed420
> > <no_reply@y...> wrote:
> > > > --- In
> > sathyasaibaba2@yahoogroups.com, "conscientiousobjector2000"
> > > > <conscientiousobjector2000@y...> wrote:
> > > > > --- In sathyasaibaba2@yahoogroups.com, saiexposed420
> > > > <no_reply@y...> wrote:
> > > > > > --- In
> > > > sathyasaibaba2@yahoogroups.com, "conscientiousobjector2000"
> > > > > > <conscientiousobjector2000@y...> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&}
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Not only that dishonesty but the hypocrite and
> > pathological
> > > > liar
> > > > > > doesn't tell people that the REASON I called snooty
Dennis
> > > > Hanisch
> > > > > > a "twirp" in the first place was because Dennis,
> > Mr. "perfect"
> > > > was
> > > > > > the FIRST person who STARTED the name calling by calling
me
> > > > > > delusional. <<
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Duhhhhhhhhhhhhhh, and why did he do that? Wasn't it
because
> > you
> > > > were
> > > > > > demanding attention and respect because of the disputed
fact
> > > > that you
> > > > > > have visions of Jesus and angels?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Considering your extremely regrettable behaviour, it is
no
> > > > wonder
> > > > > > that people did not believe your egoistic claims
including
> > me.
> > > > That's
> > > > > > why I came back to this board, to laugh at you as well
as
> > defend
> > > > > > Dennis, one of the sweetest people I've ever known, from
> > your
> > > > nasty
> > > > > > insults.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&}
> > > > >
> > > > > You must be talking about yourself nutcase. Remember, it
was
> > YOU,
> > > > the loathesome pervert, who was found asking for pics
> > of "naughty
> > > > jesus" so you can defile him. And it was YOU who lied about
> > working
> > > > for the IWF and claimed to be downloading child porn. Now
who's
> > the
> > > > sicko, idiot? <<
> > > >
> > > > Shameless liar, aren't you? Here it is again:
> > > >
> > > > The evidence provided in this posting fully exonerates me of
any
> > > > malicious allegations involving the transmitting and receipt
of
> > child
> > > > pornography. The ad-hominem fanatics still have to provide a
> > solid
> > > > refutation of all the FACTS contained herein.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --- In sathyasaibaba2@yahoogroups.com, innitball
<no_reply@y...>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > --- In sathyasaibaba2@yahoogroups.com, Lisa
> > > > > <conscientiousobjector2000@y...> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- innitball <no_reply@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > --- In sathyasaibaba2@yahoogroups.com, Lisa
> > > > > > > <conscientiousobjector2000@y...> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --- innitball <no_reply@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > --- In sathyasaibaba2@yahoogroups.com, Lisa
> > > > > > > > > <conscientiousobjector2000@y...> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > --- innitball <no_reply@yahoogroups.com>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > Anybody who has brains and looks at the
> > > > > > > > > messages
> > > > > > > > > > > on
> > > > > > > > > > > > the alt.sex sites can see that they are
> > > > > > > > > NOTHING
> > > > > > > > > > > but a
> > > > > > > > > > > > conduit for PERVERTED PORN. The people at
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > alt.sex.jesus site who are truly spritual
> > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > probably
> > > > > > > > > > > > stumbled onto it are admonishing the PERVS
> > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > get
> > > > > > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > > > > life and stop trashing Jesus.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&}
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > SO, WHAT'S YOUR POINT? SOME PEOPLE DROPPED BY
> > > > > > > TO
> > > > > > > > > SEE
> > > > > > > > > > WHAT ALT.SEX.JESUS WAS ABOUT AND WHEN THEY SAW
> > > > > > > IT
> > > > > > > > > WAS
> > > > > > > > > > A PERVERT HANGOUT TOLD THE PERVS TO GET HELP
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > The point here, my little butterfly, is why is
> > > > > > > it OK
> > > > > > > > > for some people
> > > > > > > > > to drop by to "see what alt.sex.jesus is all
> > > > > > > about"
> > > > > > > > > but it is not OK
> > > > > > > > > for me, who have admitted being curious about
> > > > > > > that
> > > > > > > > > group? The answer
> > > > > > > > > is because I am an anti-SSB activist and I was
> > > > > > > > > looking for child
> > > > > > > > > porn. Say that in court and be laughed out.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > You have a double-standard.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&}
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > No pervert liar, I don't have a double-standard.
> > > > > > > > Those people DID NOT VISIT THREE PORN sites asking
> > > > > > > for
> > > > > > > > MORE PORN, but YOU DID.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > What a liar. You "investigated" didn't you? You of
> > > > > > > all people know
> > > > > > > that I didn't ask for more porn, but simply
> > > > > > > registered my name in a
> > > > > > > defunct mail chain. Yet you twist this info and
> > > > > > > present it as a
> > > > > > > request for more porn, you immoral sick pathological
> > > > > > > L.I.A.R.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Sorry, you are a two-faced double-standardised
> > > > > > > person. It's ok for
> > > > > > > people to go there curiously and tell people off,
> > > > > > > but its not ok for
> > > > > > > a curious person like me to figure out what the
> > > > > > > group is all about.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > This is nothing new. When I was an SB devotee,
> > > > > > > Shahgols and other
> > > > > > > people tried to INVENT evidence that I visited
> > > > > > > incest groups and took
> > > > > > > porn from there. Of course they had no proof, just
> > > > > > > like you don't.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Therefore it is pretty obvious that you are just
> > > > > > > copying what other
> > > > > > > people like Shahgols have done. Which itself shows
> > > > > > > that you are in
> > > > > > > the business of creating lies. And all to avoid the
> > > > > > > fact that you
> > > > > > > cannot explain or defend why Sai Baba rapes little
> > > > > > > children and rips
> > > > > > > their anuses. Shame on you.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&}
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Here, let me refresh your memory:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Here asshole, let me refresh YOUR memory. Click on this
link
> > if you
> > > > > dare:
> > > > >
> > > > > http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-
> > > > > 8&threadm=cc96d043.0112072048.74a96087%
> > > > > 40posting.google.com&rnum=7&prev=/groups%3Fq%
> > > > 3Dauthor:dark_knight_9%
> > > > > 2540yahoo.com%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF-8%26oe%3DUTF-8%
> > 26selm%
> > > > > 3Dcc96d043.0112072048.74a96087%2540posting.google.com%
26rnum%
> > 3D7
> > > > >
> > > > > Two people here are saying "Naughty Jesus." Now where is
the
> > proof
> > > > of
> > > > > any pics being sent or received?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-
> > > > > 8&threadm=cc96d043.0112072049.33e1f076%
> > > > > 40posting.google.com&rnum=6&prev=/groups%3Fq%
> > > > 3Dauthor:dark_knight_9%
> > > > > 2540yahoo.com%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF-8%26oe%3DUTF-8%
> > 26selm%
> > > > > 3Dcc96d043.0112072049.33e1f076%2540posting.google.com%
26rnum%
> > 3D6
> > > > >
> > > > > Then click on the link that says "See this message in
context."
> > > > > Clicked? Now see how everyone there is simply
saying "jesus."
> > So
> > > > > again, where is the proof of pics being sent or received?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-
> > > > > 8&threadm=cc96d043.0112072030.34e5f60d%
> > > > > 40posting.google.com&rnum=9&prev=/groups%3Fq%
> > > > 3Dauthor:dark_knight_9%
> > > > > 2540yahoo.com%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF-8%26oe%3DUTF-8%
> > 26selm%
> > > > > 3Dcc96d043.0112072030.34e5f60d%2540posting.google.com%
26rnum%
> > 3D9
> > > > >
> > > > > Click on the link again. There people are
saying "biblical".
> > Now
> > > > > where is the proof of pics being sent or received?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-
> > > > > 8&threadm=cc96d043.0112072029.21bec267%
> > > > > 40posting.google.com&rnum=10&prev=/groups%3Fq%
> > > > 3Dauthor:dark_knight_9%
> > > > > 2540yahoo.com%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF-8%26oe%3DUTF-8%
> > 26selm%
> > > > > 3Dcc96d043.0112072029.21bec267%2540posting.google.com%
26rnum%
> > 3D10
> > > > >
> > > > > Everyone here is saying "REQ: More pics of biblical." This
is
> > > > > probably the ONLY statement you will find that even
insinuates
> > > > > something about pics. But then again, where is the proof
of
> > pics
> > > > > being sent or received?
> > > > >
> > > > > Based on the evidence that THROAT BLISS provided, I never
sent
> > OR
> > > > > received any pics at all.
> > > > >
> > > > > YOU YOURSELF are guilty of lying because you have alleged
that
> > pics
> > > > > transmitted in these newsgroups are of child pornographical
> > > > > activities. You have ASSUMED that because I was there, I
must
> > have
> > > > > been sending/receiving CP, but again you have no proof
that I
> > > > > sent/received anything at all based on the evidence that
THROAT
> > > > BLISS
> > > > > provided.
> > > > >
> > > > > Isn't it also fascinating that you admitted to Reinier in
> > private
> > > > > email that you were unable to find any CP in those
newsgroups?
> > So
> > > > not
> > > > > only do you NOT have any proof that I sent/received CP,
but you
> > > > have
> > > > > NO PROOF that CP is even being transmitted there!!
> > > > >
> > > > > CONCLUSION: You are an immoral heartless retarded liar who
has
> > > > > INVENTED and PROPAGATED sleazy lies meant to smear the
names of
> > > > anti-
> > > > > SSB activists. Not only do you have ZERO CREDIBILITY
because of
> > > > your
> > > > > lies, but you are a severely deluded insane schizophrenic
who
> > > > should
> > > > > be committed to the nearest lunatic asylum. Do you like
padded
> > > > cells?
> > > > > Never mind, you will have Jesus and his angels to keep you
> > company
> > > > if
> > > > > you get lonely.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Having experiences with divine beings is not a psychiatric
> > illness
> > > > stupid. <<
> > > >
> > > > That's not what a court of law would think. They would agree
> > with me
> > > > that you have schizophrenic symptoms.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&}
> > >
> > > >>That's not what a court of law would think. They would agree
> > with me
> > > that you have schizophrenic symptoms.<<
> > >
> > > You can't even diagnose your own stupidity or insanity much
less
> > someone elses mental illness, retard. Clairvoyants are NOT
> > schizophrenic STUPID IDIOT. Clairaudients are NOT schizophrenic
> > STUPID. You sound like one of the idiots from the Spanish
> > Inquisition. The truth is YOU are the one who should be put in a
> > padded cell. <<
> >
> >
> > In any case, the very reason why Dennis Hanisch and I criticised
you
> > as "delusional" and "crazy" is precisly because of the standard
of
> > your behaviour. His point remains the same as it always was;
people
> > who are fortunate enough to have spiritual experiences are quite
> > certain to exemplify an immaculate standard of interpersonal
> > relationships with other human beings for a start. Sadly, I
observe
> > that you are sorely lacking in this regard. Your above abusive
quote
> > proves my point very well.
> >
> > In any case, I do not think that clairvoyancy and clairaudiency
are
> > recognised in a court of law. In fact, I do believe that it is
> > possible to discredit people because of the same.
> >
> > >> It IS illegal to download porn however, which YOU admitted,
and
> > it MAY be illegal in England to impersonate an investigator.
> > > I don't have to prove you downloaded anything since YOU were
> > stupid enough to incriminate yourself. <<
> >
> > Sorry, that story was a complete fiction. You cannot admit
fiction
> > as "evidence" of anything. All you really have are a few Google
> > posts that prove nothing criminal. Face it, you are a liar.
>
>
> &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&}
>
>
> The retard thinks psychic abilities can't be used in court. What
an idiot. =
> ANYTHING that can be documented can be used in court. Police use
psychics co=
> nstantly nowadays dumbo. <<
LOL HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAA LOL !!!!
> Now, as far as asking for pics it's OBVIOUS to anybody but YOU
that you the=
> idiot asked for more pics. In FACT YOU are talking about pics in
THREE post=
> s so it's OBVIOUS your interest was in PICS!!!
>
Sorry pervert, you are a shameless liar. Simply repeating a subject
line is not proof that I was "asking for pics."
I have changed the subject line of this post to "Lisa's twisted
sense of proportion." If you reply to this post without changing the
subject line, does that mean you agree that you have a twisted sense
of proportion ????
You do have one anyway. You believe that God walking the earth is a
child rapist.
> The fact you are so obsessed with trying to act like you weren't
there for =
> pics is laughable. You are on record stating you received child
porn. Where =
> else would you receive child porn if not in this group? I leave it
for you t=
> o tell the judge.
>
Amazingly how this shameless sleazy scumbag excuse for a "woman" can
lie through her teeth so shamelessly. Has she forgotten how she
admitted in private email to Reinier that she was unable to find
child porn in that group? Has she forgotten that she has NO PROOF
that child porn is passed in that group. In fact she has no proof of
anything, yet she shamelessly speaks as if she is complete
omniscience about everything. She says i am on record saying I
received child porn, but I have already stated ON THE RECORD that
that entire story was a complete fabrication. The silly woman's case
has completely collapsed, and yet she continues obsessing about the
subject.
Face it KIDDO. You have no case. So shut up and answer questions
about why your pervert guru is molesting young boys.
> Here, let me help refresh your memory. We've gone over this so
many times y=
> ou might want to get checked for alzheimers.
>
Sure idiot, choke on it.
The evidence provided in this posting fully exonerates me of any
malicious allegations involving the transmitting and receipt of child
pornography. The ad-hominem fanatics still have to provide a solid
refutation of all the FACTS contained herein.
--- In sathyasaibaba2@yahoogroups.com, innitball <no_reply@y...>
wrote:
> --- In sathyasaibaba2@yahoogroups.com, Lisa
> <conscientiousobjector2000@y...> wrote:
> >
> >
> > --- innitball <no_reply@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
> > > --- In sathyasaibaba2@yahoogroups.com, Lisa
> > > <conscientiousobjector2000@y...> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --- innitball <no_reply@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
> > > > > --- In sathyasaibaba2@yahoogroups.com, Lisa
> > > > > <conscientiousobjector2000@y...> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- innitball <no_reply@yahoogroups.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > Anybody who has brains and looks at the
> > > > > messages
> > > > > > > on
> > > > > > > > the alt.sex sites can see that they are
> > > > > NOTHING
> > > > > > > but a
> > > > > > > > conduit for PERVERTED PORN. The people at
> > > the
> > > > > > > > alt.sex.jesus site who are truly spritual
> > > and
> > > > > > > probably
> > > > > > > > stumbled onto it are admonishing the PERVS
> > > to
> > > > > get
> > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > life and stop trashing Jesus.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&}
> > > > > >
> > > > > > SO, WHAT'S YOUR POINT? SOME PEOPLE DROPPED BY
> > > TO
> > > > > SEE
> > > > > > WHAT ALT.SEX.JESUS WAS ABOUT AND WHEN THEY SAW
> > > IT
> > > > > WAS
> > > > > > A PERVERT HANGOUT TOLD THE PERVS TO GET HELP
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > The point here, my little butterfly, is why is
> > > it OK
> > > > > for some people
> > > > > to drop by to "see what alt.sex.jesus is all
> > > about"
> > > > > but it is not OK
> > > > > for me, who have admitted being curious about
> > > that
> > > > > group? The answer
> > > > > is because I am an anti-SSB activist and I was
> > > > > looking for child
> > > > > porn. Say that in court and be laughed out.
> > > > >
> > > > > You have a double-standard.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&}
> > > >
> > > > No pervert liar, I don't have a double-standard.
> > > > Those people DID NOT VISIT THREE PORN sites asking
> > > for
> > > > MORE PORN, but YOU DID.
> > >
> > >
> > > What a liar. You "investigated" didn't you? You of
> > > all people know
> > > that I didn't ask for more porn, but simply
> > > registered my name in a
> > > defunct mail chain. Yet you twist this info and
> > > present it as a
> > > request for more porn, you immoral sick pathological
> > > L.I.A.R.
> > >
> > > Sorry, you are a two-faced double-standardised
> > > person. It's ok for
> > > people to go there curiously and tell people off,
> > > but its not ok for
> > > a curious person like me to figure out what the
> > > group is all about.
> > >
> > > This is nothing new. When I was an SB devotee,
> > > Shahgols and other
> > > people tried to INVENT evidence that I visited
> > > incest groups and took
> > > porn from there. Of course they had no proof, just
> > > like you don't.
> > >
> > > Therefore it is pretty obvious that you are just
> > > copying what other
> > > people like Shahgols have done. Which itself shows
> > > that you are in
> > > the business of creating lies. And all to avoid the
> > > fact that you
> > > cannot explain or defend why Sai Baba rapes little
> > > children and rips
> > > their anuses. Shame on you.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&}
> >
> > Here, let me refresh your memory:
> >
> >
>
>
> Here asshole, let me refresh YOUR memory. Click on this link if you
> dare:
>
> http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-
> 8&threadm=cc96d043.0112072048.74a96087%
> 40posting.google.com&rnum=7&prev=/groups%3Fq%
3Dauthor:dark_knight_9%
> 2540yahoo.com%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF-8%26oe%3DUTF-8%26selm%
> 3Dcc96d043.0112072048.74a96087%2540posting.google.com%26rnum%3D7
>
> Two people here are saying "Naughty Jesus." Now where is the proof
of
> any pics being sent or received?
>
>
> http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-
> 8&threadm=cc96d043.0112072049.33e1f076%
> 40posting.google.com&rnum=6&prev=/groups%3Fq%
3Dauthor:dark_knight_9%
> 2540yahoo.com%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF-8%26oe%3DUTF-8%26selm%
> 3Dcc96d043.0112072049.33e1f076%2540posting.google.com%26rnum%3D6
>
> Then click on the link that says "See this message in context."
> Clicked? Now see how everyone there is simply saying "jesus." So
> again, where is the proof of pics being sent or received?
>
>
> http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-
> 8&threadm=cc96d043.0112072030.34e5f60d%
> 40posting.google.com&rnum=9&prev=/groups%3Fq%
3Dauthor:dark_knight_9%
> 2540yahoo.com%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF-8%26oe%3DUTF-8%26selm%
> 3Dcc96d043.0112072030.34e5f60d%2540posting.google.com%26rnum%3D9
>
> Click on the link again. There people are saying "biblical". Now
> where is the proof of pics being sent or received?
>
>
> http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-
> 8&threadm=cc96d043.0112072029.21bec267%
> 40posting.google.com&rnum=10&prev=/groups%3Fq%
3Dauthor:dark_knight_9%
> 2540yahoo.com%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF-8%26oe%3DUTF-8%26selm%
> 3Dcc96d043.0112072029.21bec267%2540posting.google.com%26rnum%3D10
>
> Everyone here is saying "REQ: More pics of biblical." This is
> probably the ONLY statement you will find that even insinuates
> something about pics. But then again, where is the proof of pics
> being sent or received?
>
> Based on the evidence that THROAT BLISS provided, I never sent OR
> received any pics at all.
>
> YOU YOURSELF are guilty of lying because you have alleged that pics
> transmitted in these newsgroups are of child pornographical
> activities. You have ASSUMED that because I was there, I must have
> been sending/receiving CP, but again you have no proof that I
> sent/received anything at all based on the evidence that THROAT
BLISS
> provided.
>
> Isn't it also fascinating that you admitted to Reinier in private
> email that you were unable to find any CP in those newsgroups? So
not
> only do you NOT have any proof that I sent/received CP, but you
have
> NO PROOF that CP is even being transmitted there!!
>
> CONCLUSION: You are an immoral heartless retarded liar who has
> INVENTED and PROPAGATED sleazy lies meant to smear the names of
anti-
> SSB activists. Not only do you have ZERO CREDIBILITY because of
your
> lies, but you are a severely deluded insane schizophrenic who
should
> be committed to the nearest lunatic asylum. Do you like padded
cells?
> Never mind, you will have Jesus and his angels to keep you company
if
> you get lonely.
|
|
Offline
