Yahoo! Groups Tips
Did you know...
You can set the sort order of messages? Just click on the link in the date column. Your preferences will be remembered, so you don't have to do it again when you return.
|
conscientiousobjector2000 <conscientiousobjector2000@...> wrote:
&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&}
>> Dadlani, the perverted fool just can't stop lying. YOU made the statement
that you were downloading illegal porn, idiot. I have the original post to
prove it so NOBODY is slandering stupid you. <<
Lisa the racist lying fool somehow fails not to notice the countless times that
I have stated that such a statement was made in an attempt to GET YOU OFF MY
BACK.
Obviously it backfired, thanks to your Nazi fascist mentality. You have the
original posts, but you do not have the successive posts where I have CLEARLY
STATED that my "admission" is simply a story. Sorry, this does not count. I have
never downloaded child porn and will never do so. Any attempts to smear me
further is to be counted as libel/slander as well as defamation of character.
>> There's enough circumstantial evidence on the jesus porn site alone to prove
what a twisted pervert you are. <<
Oh yes, enough "circumstantial evidence" that YOU have continually failed to
respond to. Now I wonder why..
>> The site I posted says the age of consent is 16 in Arkansas, idiot. Live with
it. Doesn't apply to India anyway. <<
Either you are some kind of psychotic retard or you are just very very stupid.
Kindly explain to me why we should "live" with the fact that some crappy
activist's page that YOU posted has INCORRECT information according to Arkansas
state laws?
And, as Afshin just said, if it doesn't apply to India then WHY did you post it,
you silly demented fool?
>> Besides, you are really getting your cart ahead of the horse considering your
cowardly alleged victims haven't filed charges in India as directed by the
consulate site. <<
This nonsense again. You were caught lying with your pants down about the age of
consent in Arkansas. You think that an activists' page has more authority than
Arkansas state laws. This just shows the standard of your "research" as well as
your mental state. Not only do you have NO credibility, but nobody even listens
to you. You are simply talking to yourself here most of the time.
>> One would think you idiots would have enough common sense to realize your
campaign is failing because your alleged victims aren't doing their part. <<
Hahahahahahahahahahahahaha! Out of touch with reality or WHAT ?! :-))
Hello? UNESCO? Adelaide University? DR Dokumentary? BBC Secret Swami? More to
come?
Failing? ROFL! :-)))
>> The idiots who wrote the article obviously didn't do their research or they
would know the CBI complaint was based on the exact same info that suspicious
Hari allegedly gave to the Supreme Court which was THROWN out because NOT ONE of
the alleged victims could have the courage to show up.
If the Supreme Court rejected it SO did the CBI, stupid. <<
As far as I remember, the case was sent back to the High Court. It was not
"thrown out" per se.
Sorry, fool. This is a current article and there are PENDING complaints against
Sai Baba in the CBI. Mind you, we are not the only ones who are trying to get
Sai Baba subject to an investigation. LOL!
>> Wake up idiots. NO court, NO guilt (unless you are a FASCIST). Got it yet,
idiots? <<
Did you ever stop to think for a moment that courts are not always successful in
proving guilt? How many innocent people have been sent to jail or death row for
crimes that they did not commit? Huh? A stupid person like you never thinks such
things.
Even when we finally haul Sai Baba into court by his hair, who is to say that he
or his ashram minions will not try to pull all sorts of political strings to get
him off the hook. Look at what is happening to the Sankaracharya, you silly.
Think of it as a "dry run" for Sai Baba.
Courts are NOT faultless procedures for proving guilt. In any case, you have
devoted NO time whatsoever to wondering if he is actually guilty of sexual
abuse/molestations or not. Not everything can be proved in court, yet crimes are
committed anyway. So, Sai Baba may have committed many crimes but because he is
not proved "guilty" in court that means he is innocent?
>> All brainless retards. <<
Exactly. This is the sorry state of Sai devotees everywhere, who bury their
heads in the sand thinking that this is all some "test of faith" or something.
Morons.
"Tiny whiney men in the anti-Sai group."
-- Lisa de Witt, Dec 1 2004.
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
|
|
Offline
Send Email