*** Return To Sanjay Dadlani Exposed Main Page ***


Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
sathyasaibaba2 · Sathya Sai Baba - Exploring the Life and Work of India's Famous Guru
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
You can search the group for older messages.

Messages

Messages Help
Up Thread | Message Index | View Source | Unwrap Lines Message 34018 of 43471  < Previous  |  Next >
  
  
From: donmakaveli22
Date: Fri Sep 5, 2003  3:54 pm
Subject: Re: [Sathya Sai Baba] De Twitt Defeated!
donmakaveli22
Offline Offline
--- In sathyasaibaba2@yahoogroups.com, Lisa
<conscientiousobjector2000@y...> wrote:
>
>
> --- donmakaveli22 <no_reply@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
> > --- In sathyasaibaba2@yahoogroups.com, Lisa
> > <conscientiousobjector2000@y...> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > --- innitball <no_reply@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
> > > > --- In sathyasaibaba2@yahoogroups.com, Lisa
> > > > <conscientiousobjector2000@y...> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --- innitball <no_reply@yahoogroups.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > > > --- In sathyasaibaba2@yahoogroups.com, Lisa
> > > > > > <conscientiousobjector2000@y...> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --- innitball <no_reply@yahoogroups.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > --- In sathyasaibaba2@yahoogroups.com,
> > > > > > truth_bliss
> > > > > > > > <no_reply@y...>
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >>Face it, Beyerstein's an idiot.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I already refuted his ridiculous study
> > and
> > > > now
> > > > > > he
> > > > > > > > > looks like an idiot who doesn't even
> > know
> > > > how
> > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > do
> > > > > > > > > basic research.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > If you accept Beyerstein's medioric
> > crap
> > > > as
> > > > > > > > > 'legitimate' research, you need your
> > head
> > > > > > > > examined.
> > > > > > > > > But then, we already knew that. <<
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > You clearly showed Beyerstein's
> > > > incompetency
> > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > pretentiousness.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Based on a debatable point about Thomas
> > > > Edison?
> > > > > > > > Hardly!
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The study still stands.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Refute ALL of it, or shut up.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&}
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > AND Beyerstein's stupidity regarding the
> > many
> > > > > > meanings
> > > > > > > of dharma. I'm not done yet...I'm just
> > > > getting
> > > > > > warmed
> > > > > > > up.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > How is that stupidity? I already told you
> > that
> > > > > > 'Dharma' has many
> > > > > > meanings. SB says one thing and Beyerstein
> > says
> > > > > > another. You can at
> > > > > > least acknowledge that as a debatable point
> > > > since SB
> > > > > > can NEVER claim
> > > > > > to have the true meaning, but of course you
> > > > won't
> > > > > > because you're on a
> > > > > > an insane mission to prove that SB is
> > completely
> > > > > > totally OUT THERE!!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Warmed up? Hahahaha. I'd like to see you get
> > > > > > OFFICIAL letters from
> > > > > > those "in the know" who can confirm that SB
> > > > > > materialised the real
> > > > > > wood from the original Jesus crucifix. I'd
> > like
> > > > to
> > > > > > see you PROVE that
> > > > > > SB ressurected Walter Cowan from the dead.
> > I'd
> > > > like
> > > > > > to see you PROVE
> > > > > > that SB can control/manipulate the weather.
> > Etc
> > > > etc
> > > > > > etc AD INFINITUM.
> > > > > > Don't mean to get all almighty here, but you
> > > > know
> > > > > > very well that I
> > > > > > was a defending SB devotee once upon a time
> > and
> > > > set
> > > > > > out to do exactly
> > > > > > the same thing you THINK you can do. If I
> > > > couldn't
> > > > > > do it, I'd sure
> > > > > > like to see you try. It'll be fun to watch,
> > > > that's
> > > > > > for sure. :-))
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Still, I haven't seen you prove ONE person
> > was
> > > > > > > actually molested by Sai Baba. ALL the
> > > > so-called
> > > > > > > 'victims' seem to have dumped their load
> > and
> > > > > > > disappeared like cowards. Very suspicious
> > to
> > > > say
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > least.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Too bad that you are still the New Kid On
> > The
> > > > Block.
> > > > > > There were
> > > > > > plenty of molestees around these clubs in
> > the
> > > > days
> > > > > > when this club
> > > > > > first started, actually participating in
> > > > discussions
> > > > > > and stuff. They
> > > > > > left because of the insane disgusting antics
> > of
> > > > > > Radhavanamali and the
> > > > > > guttermouth lowclass antics of Throat Bliss.
> > > > Still,
> > > > > > too bad you
> > > > > > missed out though.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > And we are talking about Beyerstein's paper.
> > > > What
> > > > > > does sexual
> > > > > > molestation have to do with anything, silly?
> > At
> > > > > > least stick to the
> > > > > > point under discussion.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&}
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I give up. The idiot is TOO DUMB to get it.
> > > > >
> > > > > Everyone can see how continually stupid you
> > are.
> > > > I'm
> > > > > putting you on my ignore list.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Awwwwwwwwwwwwwww, my darling Lisa is gonna
> > ignore me
> > > > now, poor baby,
> > > > because she cannot answer simple questions.
> > > > Boo-bloody-hoo.
> > > >
> > > > ROFL
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&]
> > >
> > > No, it's becoming increasingly clear you're either
> > > doing too many drugs or you've lost your mind.
> > I'm
> > > tired of dealing with YOU nutcase. You are totally
> > > irrational. You'll have to kiss your own butt.
> > >
> >
> > It's becoming increasingly clear that you are
> > totally incapable of
> > answering direct, penetratig questions that
> > implicate your guru and
> > his Org in criminal activities.
> >
> >
>
>
> &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&}
>
> The burden of PROOF is on YOU Machiaveli (very
> appropriate name for a jerk).


It's Makaveli, not Machiavelli. Burden of proof is what? I asked you some questions that you simply cannot answer. Simple.


> You deal with the nutcase pervert Dadlani for eight
> months and see if he's worth wasting your time over,
> smartmouth.

Oh, me and Dadlani are different people are we? :)




 
  
  
Up Thread | Message Index | View Source | Unwrap Lines Message 34018 of 43471  < Previous  |  Next >

Copyright © 2005 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Copyright/IP Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help