--- In advaitajnana@yahoogroups.com, "Tony OClery" <aoclery@y...> wrote:
>
> --- In sathyasaibaba2@yahoogroups.com, "Tony OClery" aoclery@y...
> wrote:
> Namaste,
>
> It is not necessary to prove a legal case against sb to disprove his
> claim to be an avatar; It is almost impossible due to juristions and
> corruption anyway.
>
> Out of his own mouth he says he only has one desire and that is for
> us all to become realised.
>
> So if it can be shown that he has desires or even preferences other
> than that it makes him a liar and a fraud.
>
> He was addicted to betel for 45 years is one proof.
>
> He has a preference for certain types of foods is another.
>
> Either are enough to prove that he cannot be an avatar, for avatars
> are desireless.
>
> As I have said--I work alone and only when presented with an
> opportunity to respond or illuminate. I have participated in several
> exposures in the media and written several published articles on the
> subject, as well as being instrumental in 2000 in getting 'the
> findings' on to the internet magazines for the first time.
>
> Exposure is the operative word and show he has desire, therefore in
> the Hindu tradition he is a fraud...............ONS..Tony.
*******************************

Tony, it is not necessary to prove a legal case against you for your lies, deceit and dishonesty against Sathya Sai Baba:

http://www.saisathyasai.com/baba/Ex-Baba.com/A-Oclery/anthony-tony-oclery.html

ANTHONY (TONY) O'CLERY: "That page you have on me is a joke and a great advert for this forum, it does more to attract more anti sais than anything. I have posted it around a few forums for people to laugh at...T"

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/sathyasaibaba2/message/47190

I guess the people who come here can laugh at it too. Also, I am posting my relevant link in response to a your post about SSB. Therefore, you can't say I am posting off topic. I am responding to your post about SSB with a post about your lies, deceit and dishonesty against SSB. This post is 100% relevant :-)

ONS