Robert Priddy's Erroneous And False Accusations Against Me
One would think that Robert Priddy would tire of misrepresentations, illogical speculations and conspiracy theories. Apparently, that is not the case. Just recently, Robert Priddy added the following paragraph on his site:
"Please note: The only spokesman defending the Sathya Sai Organisation in public calls himself Gerald 'Joe' Moreno. He uses a hidden (anonymous) IP and his identity cannot be checked by any means (no CV, no known qualification or abode) He attacks the many valid criticisms of its proven unaccountability and cult of secrecy and cover-up and profusely propagates lies and slanders. He creates bogus e-mail addresses and names to make false submissions to the Sai Petition, which he also freely admits on his website. Neither the International nor any national or local Sathya Sai Organisation has rejected Gerald Moreno as their spokesman in the Internet, and so one must conclude that in passively accepting his untruths, defamations and cover-up on their behalf, they are satisfied with him. Though he alleges he is self-appointed , he is de facto as official an Internet spokesperson for defence of entire International Sai Organisation as there is, which fact is abundantly evident from his many web pages and the fact that he has no other work but is well-funded."
Robert Priddy is well aware that I am not using an anonymous identity. Robert Priddy chooses to lie for reasons he alone knows. As a matter of fact, my full name, full address and full phone number were publicly displayed on Reinier Van Der Sandt's (now deleted) website against me. Reinier is Priddy's friend.
Ojvind Kyro (a biased, Anti-Sai journalist) gave my contact information to Anti-Sai Activists after he tried contacting me by phone. Since Anti-Sai Activists have not been able to dig up dirt on me, they deleted their web pages against me and are now resorting to the fallacious claim that I am using an anonymous identity.
One must remember that these are the people who are "exposing" Sathya Sai Baba. They lack even the most basic integrity and do nothing but spread untruths and misrepresent facts. I fully know the depth of corruption and decay prevalent among Anti-Sai Activists (Robert Priddy included).
My IP's are not "hidden (anonymous)". I made/make no attempt to hide my IP's (my ISP has 3 of them for the area I live in, 1 resolves to Phoenix and 2 resolve to New Mexico) and they are recorded on Wikipedia, Yahoo Groups and even the emails I sent to Robert Priddy. My IP's are not even proxy IPs. They faithfully resolve to my ISP's destination and they have not changed in the past two years. It appears that Conny Larsson is behind the lie that I am hiding my IP address. As it turns out, Conny fed this lie to Priddy, who in turn is repeating it like a trained parrot. Click Here to see how I caught Conny lying about my IP.
My identity has been checked and discovered by Anti-Sai Activists. How would Ojvind Kyro get my phone number and call me if I am not who I say I am?
SaiPetition.net had, for many months, allowed anyone to submit multiple, fake signatures to their online petition against Sathya Sai Baba. After bringing my valid concerns (about the severely flawed submission policy on their site) to the attention of SaiPetition.net (and getting nowhere), I decided that the best way to prove that anyone could make multiple submissions was by doing so myself, and screen-capturing the results. I promptly divulged, on my website (Ref. 1), that I had made 5 fake submission, using the names: "Joe Apodaca", "Joe M", J M", "Kevin Iassa" and "Issac Nivek" ("Nivek" being "kevin" spelled backwards). I also provided a screen capture as proof (Ref. 2). These multiple submissions were made on September 27th & 28th 2004. SaiPetition.net found out about this and they only deleted (for some unknown reason) "Joe M" and "J M", refusing to remove "Joe Apodaca", "Kevin Iassa" and "Issac Nivek". SaiPetition.net formed an anonymous "committee" composed of six people, all who read my site, and critiqued my webpage on November 23rd 2004. Click Here to view their critique and my response. Consequently, the SaiPetition.net Committee read and knew about these multiple submissions.
Even though it was very clearly stated, on my website, that I made a fake submission using the name "Joe Apodaca", Robert Priddy took this fake submission and put it on his "Ex Office Bearers" page, using it as a first-hand account against Sathya Sai Baba! Needless to say, there was no way for Priddy to contact me (as I used a fake email as well), but the signature was regarded as authentic, without any sort of verification, and was cited on his page as a legitimate signature! I think this speaks volumes for the so-called "integrity" of SaiPetition.net's "signatures"! This also creates valid doubts to the authenticity of the names used on Priddy's "Ex Office Bearers" page. This proves that SaiPetition.net and Robert Priddy do not verify signatures in any manner, shape or form. Click Here to view the google cache (along with a google index image) to Robert Priddy's page, where he used this faked submission as a genuine and first-hand account from someone who was a "Prominent Ex Devotee Of Sai Baba"! Priddy has refused to remove the fake name, even though I informed him about it (through 2 different emails) on July 24th 2005. To date he has refused to remove this fraudulent information from his site (this page updated September 14th 2006)!
Robert Priddy said, "Though he alleges he is self-appointed , he is de facto as official an Internet spokesperson for defence of entire International Sai Organisation as there is, which fact is abundantly evident from his many web pages and the fact that he has no other work but is well-funded." This is a perfect example of Priddy's conspiracy mentality. Priddy is making erroneous speculations with no proof (something he loves to do with Sathya Sai Baba). Of course, Priddy fails to tell everyone that he has several websites against Sathya Sai Baba. Using Priddy's logic (illogic) since he has 14 current/former Anti-Sai Websites, "he has no other work but is well-funded". Robert Priddy's Sites are:
http://home.no.net/rrpriddy/ (Personal Site With Anti-Sai Material) 102 pages
http://saibaba-x.org.uk (Active Anti-Sai Site)
http://saibaba.org.uk (Former Anti-Sai Site)
http://home.no.net/anir/Sai/ (Active Anti-Sai Site) 410 pages
http://home.no.net/abacusa/ (Active Anti-Sai Site) 13 pages
http://www.gethome.no/~reirob/ (Active Anti-Sai Site) 25+ pages
http://robertpriddy.wordpress.com/ (Active Anti-Sai Blog) Many Pages
http://home.chello.no/~reirob/ (Active Anti-Sai Site) 10 pages
http://members.tripod.com/saisat0/ (Anti-Sai Site: Deleted for defamatory content) 5 pages
http://www.angeltowns.com/members/tanik/ (Old Anti-Sai Site: Deleted for defamatory content)
http://www.angeltowns2.net/tanik/SaiBaba/index.htm (New Anti-Sai Site (12/05): Deleted for defamatory content)
http://www.spaceports.com/~saiinfo/ (Anti-Sai Site: Deleted for defamatory content)
http://metasci.tripod.com/ (Anti-Sai Site: Deleted for defamatory content) 2 pages
Click Here to view screen captures that show how Robert Priddy's site is listed on Porn Sites! It appears that Priddy paid to get his Anti-Sai Site listed on SeekInsider.com (which is a no longer existent, pay-per-click Search Engine) under the Category: "World Wide Sex Com - World Wide Sex Directory - World Wide Sex"! Click Here to see the Google Cache. Guess Priddy did not have the foresight to see that by listing his site on a World Wide Sex Directory, porn sites would reference his site for content! Who "funded" Priddy to put his site on this pay-per-click sex directory?
Priddy stated that, "Neither the International nor any national or local Sathya Sai Organisation has rejected Gerald Moreno as their spokesman in the Internet, and so one must conclude that in passively accepting his untruths, defamations and cover-up on their behalf, they are satisfied with him." The Sai Org. has not said anything about Lisa De Witt either. I guess the Sai Org. is "passively" satisfied with her too? Also, the Sai Org. has never said anything against Robert Priddy himself! Therefore, we must logically conclude (as Priddy illogically does) that the Sai Org. is "passively" satisfied with him as well! More asinine logical fallacies from Robert Priddy. His arguments are wholly absurd!
The fact of the matter is that Robert Priddy and his cohorts have made zero progress against Sathya Sai Baba. Of course, this has been a source of great consternation for Priddy (even more so with my public exposure of his lies, deceit and dishonesty). Priddy has a big problem telling the truth. He better argues his case by inferring the worst case conspiratorial scenario and by misrepresenting the facts. That is all he has, and one can clearly see how bitter he is about it!
Update: December 26th 2005: Just recently, Robert Priddy created a new and anonymous Anti-Sai Site on Angeltowns2 (Reference). Because I am familiar with Priddy's previous site on Angeltowns (which was deleted due to its defamatory content), I was able to identify it was his. Priddy withholds his identity on this site, yet hypocritically castigates me for withholding mine (although I do not withhold my identity)! Another glaring example of Priddy's self-serving hypocrisy in action.
Update: December 27th 2005: After publicly exposing Robert Priddy's new an anonymous Anti-Sai Site, Priddy & Co. rushed to do damage control by creating an index page (which was not originally there) and attributing the articles to Priddy (Reference). Now people can see how these former followers scramble to do damage control when they are exposed for their subterfuge, deceit and dishonesty.
December 27th 2005: AngelTowns2 deleted Priddy's site for defamatory content!
PRIDDY'S UNATTRIBUTED DEFAMATORY COMMENTS
Just recently, Priddy added the following paragraph, about me, on his new AngelTowns2 Anti-Sai Site. This page was deleted by Angeltowns due to its defamatory content. Therefore, Priddy moved it to his own site at chello.no/~reirob. The Chello.no site also deleted this page due to its defamatory content. Consequently, Priddy moved it again to the hetnet.nl/~exbaba site:
"In many and various of the anonymous joe's web pages, though he claims not to be a member of the Sathya Sai Organisation himself, he attacks against every criticism raised about it on the thinnest of pretexts and without any documentation to back up his vague and offensive claims. He also tries to defend the indefensible actions of the current Sai Organisation world leader, International Chairman Dr. M. Goldstein, and he is clearly in league with Goldstein and other leading US Sai Organisation members and supporters. He is an old friend of Robert M. Baskin, a long-term Sai follower. Pretending to be an 'independent researcher', the Sai Organisation's pet stooge does their street-fighting for them with which they cannot afford to dirty their reputation further (since Sai Baba has ordered them not to answer any allegations whatever). It is done dirtily in that he attacks the many valid criticisms of its proven unaccountability and cult of secrecy and cover-up - mainly with shameless ad hominem arguments and hair-splitting decoy issues of a pitifully low level of knowledge and lacking investigation. He widely propagates lies and slanders and the wildest kinds of misinformation against any critics of Sai Baba so as to try to cloud the issue and cover up the many Sai Baba crimes that are most credibly alleged on a large scale by many. He has descended to the gutter level of other vulgar flamers and defamers - whom he also supports - on bulletin boards, such as sathyasaibaba2. He creates bogus e-mail addresses and names to make false submissions to the Sai Petition, which he also freely admits on his website, and he is guilty of counterfeiting, as has been shown by Basava Premanand. Last but far from least, he posts photos of critics of Sai Baba with distorted faces and added bodies of a pornographic kind! This is the level at which this anonymnous joe operates."
Robert Priddy is relating more scurrilous fabrications and gutter untruths against me under the guise of anonymity (the article is unsigned and does not link to any other page). Why doesn't this surprise me? I am not "an old friend of Robert M. Baskin". I have never met Robert Baskin in my life. I have no idea where Priddy got this total disinformation from.
Of course all of the "dirty" accusations that Priddy made against me are not cited or linked to, so they amount to nothing more than ad hominem attacks. I have directly cited Priddy's dirty and filthy websites (which were even indexed on pornographic sites due their vulgar content: References: 01 - 02). Therefore, I can support all of my opinions with verifiable information. Priddy cannot. Priddy bases his opinions on speculation and mental whimsy.
Anti-Sai's "valid criticisms" are not valid. They are wholly misleading, inaccurate and oftentimes (more often than not) drift into frenzied conspiracy theories.
Priddy also accused me of "lies and slander and the wildest kids of misinformation against any critics of Sai Baba". Why can't Priddy cite examples? Once again, I have backed up all of my opinions about critics with verifiable data (Reference). Priddy cannot back up his spurious claims against me.
Although Priddy accused me of supporting "vulgar flamers and defamers" (no names given), Priddy said absolutely nothing about his support for the "vulgar flamers and defamers" Tony O'Clery and Sanjay Dadlani. Sanjay Dadlani is the person who requested Jesus Pornography (Reference) and made grotesque, deviant, trashy, sleazy, slimy, misogynistic and racist comments on a blog he thought was private (which I discovered: Reference)! Priddy said absolutely nothing about their behavior (probably because they are his friends and fellow Anti-Sai Activists). Since Priddy has not spoken out against O'Clery and Dadlani's behavior, "one must conclude that in passively accepting their untruths, defamations and cover-up on their behalf, Priddy is satisfied with them"! More self-serving hypocrisy from Robert Priddy.
Basava Premanand has not proven me guilty of "counterfeiting" anything. Where is the proof? Premanand is another shameless liar who even accused me of being sexually abused by Sathya Sai Baba (no kidding)! Notice how Priddy's friends have a propensity to exaggerate, mislead and lie?
Also, I did not create photos of critics "of a pornographic kind". I was sent images from "PremaPerm" in response to Dadlani's posting of "merged images" of Sathya Sai Baba on his blog. It is also revealing how Priddy starts ranting about images of a "pornographic kind" yet thinks nothing about an image depicting Sathya Sai Baba receiving oral sex, from a child, underneath his robe! Not only did Dadlani post that image, Sandt also posted it on the SathyaSaiBaba2 Yahoo Group (Reference). Priddy also sees nothing wrong with the "pornographic kind" of image that Reinier posted of Sathya Sai Baba holding a barbell with his penis. Apparently, these images meet Priddy's low standard of morality! Priddy thinks that those images are perfectly justified, but when the tables are turned, it is so unfair. Tough luck, Priddles! Robert Priddy has become a babbling, acidic and dark personality who bases his "truth" and "facts" on far-fetched conspiracy theories and a cult-like fascination for the unverfiable and unreal.
 Update: September 4th 2006 |