Exposing The Anti-Sai Activist: Robert Priddy
Defamatory Attacks Addressed: Response 2:
Just recently, Priddy added the following paragraph about me on his new AngelTowns2 Anti-Sai Site. This page was deleted by Angeltowns due to its defamatory content. Therefore, Priddy moved it to his own site at chello.no/~reirob. The Chello.no site also deleted this page due to its defamatory content. Priddy moved it to the hetnet.nl/~exbaba site where it was deleted and moved once again to Priddy’s site where it remains unsigned by him.
In many and various of the anonymous joe’s web pages, though he claims not to be a member of the Sathya Sai Organisation himself, he attacks against every criticism raised about it on the thinnest of pretexts and without any documentation to back up his vague and offensive claims. He also tries to defend the indefensible actions of the current Sai Organisation world leader, International Chairman Dr. M. Goldstein, and he is clearly in league with Goldstein and other leading US Sai Organisation members and supporters. He is an old friend of Robert M. Baskin, a long-term Sai follower. Pretending to be an ‘independent researcher’, the Sai Organisation’s pet stooge does their street-fighting for them with which they cannot afford to dirty their reputation further (since Sai Baba has ordered them not to answer any allegations whatever). It is done dirtily in that he attacks the many valid criticisms of its proven unaccountability and cult of secrecy and cover-up - mainly with shameless ad hominem arguments and hair-splitting decoy issues of a pitifully low level of knowledge and lacking investigation. He widely propagates lies and slanders and the wildest kinds of misinformation against any critics of Sai Baba so as to try to cloud the issue and cover up the many Sai Baba crimes that are most credibly alleged on a large scale by many. He has descended to the gutter level of other vulgar flamers and defamers - whom he also supports - on bulletin boards, such as sathyasaibaba2. He creates bogus e-mail addresses and names to make false submissions to the Sai Petition, which he also freely admits on his website, and he is guilty of counterfeiting, as has been shown by Basava Premanand. Last but far from least, he posts photos of critics of Sai Baba with distorted faces and added bodies of a pornographic kind! This is the level at which this anonymnous joe operates.
Robert Priddy is relating more scurrilous fabrications and gutter untruths against me under the guise of anonymity (the article is unsigned and does not link to any other page). Why doesn’t this surprise me? I am not “an old friend of Robert M. Baskin”. I have never met Robert Baskin in my life. I have no idea where Priddy got this total disinformation from.
Of course all of the “dirty” accusations that Priddy made against me are not cited or linked to, so they amount to nothing more than ad hominem attacks. I have directly cited Priddy’s dirty and filthy websites (which were even indexed on pornographic sites due their vulgar content: References: 01 - 02). Therefore, I can support all of my opinions with verifiable information. Priddy cannot. Priddy bases his opinions on speculation and mental whimsy.
Anti-Sai’s “valid criticisms” are not valid. They are wholly misleading, inaccurate and oftentimes (more often than not) drift into frenzied conspiracy theories.
Priddy also accused me of “lies and slander and the wildest kids of misinformation against any critics of Sai Baba”. Why can’t Priddy cite examples? Once again, I have backed up all of my opinions about critics with verifiable data (Reference). Priddy cannot back up his spurious claims against me.
Although Priddy accused me of supporting “vulgar flamers and defamers” (no names given), Priddy said absolutely nothing about his support for the “vulgar flamers and defamers” Tony O’Clery and Sanjay Dadlani. Sanjay Dadlani is the person who requested Jesus Pornography (Reference) and made grotesque, deviant, trashy, sleazy, slimy, misogynistic and racist comments on a blog he thought was private (which I discovered: Reference)! Priddy said absolutely nothing about their behavior (probably because they are his friends and fellow Anti-Sai Activists). Since Priddy has not spoken out against O’Clery and Dadlani’s behavior, “one must conclude that in passively accepting their untruths, defamations and cover-up on their behalf, Priddy is satisfied with them”! More self-serving hypocrisy from Robert Priddy.
Basava Premanand has not proven me guilty of “counterfeiting” anything. Where is the proof? Premanand is another shameless liar who even accused me of being sexually abused by Sathya Sai Baba (no kidding)! Notice how Priddy’s friends have a propensity to exaggerate, mislead and lie?
Also, I did not create photos of critics “of a pornographic kind”. I was sent images from “PremaPerm” in response to Dadlani’s posting of “merged images” of Sathya Sai Baba on his blog. It is also revealing how Priddy starts ranting about images of a “pornographic kind” yet thinks nothing about an image depicting Sathya Sai Baba receiving oral sex, from a child, underneath his robe! Not only did Dadlani post that image, Sandt also posted it on the SathyaSaiBaba2 Yahoo Group (Reference). Priddy also sees nothing wrong with the “pornographic kind” of image that Reinier posted of Sathya Sai Baba holding a barbell with his penis. Apparently, these images meet Priddy’s low standard of morality! Priddy thinks that those images are perfectly justified, but when the tables are turned, it is so unfair. Tough luck, Priddles! Robert Priddy has become a babbling, acidic and dark personality who bases his “truth” and “facts” on far-fetched conspiracy theories and a cult-like fascination for the unverfiable and unreal.