Exposing The Anti-Sai Activist: Robert Priddy
Another Spiteful & Erroneous Lie:
Like a person spiralling completely out of control (or suffering from early stages of senile dementia), Robert Priddy made more erroneous accusations against me without even performing the most remedial of research. If Robert Priddy does this to me, one can only imagine to what extent he does this with Sathya Sai Baba.
On June 11th 2006, a person with the IP 220.127.116.11 submitted a comment on the Wikipedia Sathya Sai Baba talk page that stated the following:
Hii Mr Kazlev, This is the anonymous poster. Hope you are doing well. By the way, due to your suggestion, i’ve selected a pseudonym which will be “Mad”. I also agree with your comment on the inefficiency of the whole process of the endless argument and fights to get over a point. Many a times i’ve thought about the amount of time people spend on this page about editing, reverting and what not…And used to think that if the people over here click on the link www.thehungersite.com during that time or send that link to other people they know, more hungry people will get food. At the same time, till now, i haven’t seen anything that would not lead me to a conclusion of not supporting what SSS108 has been doing. If everybody left this page thinking that its difficult to face the bickerings, onslaught of edits (covert and overt), then this page would certainly wouldn’t have improved. This is more important when there has been “co-incidence” edits at many a point of time whenever there comes a report which is pro Sathya Sai. So while i would prefer to spend my time clicking on www.thehungersite.com, i would like to extend my support to SSS108 with the work he is doing. Mr Kazlev, so we can join up together to increase the number of clickings on www.thehungersite.com Hope you accept my invitation. “Mad”” (Reference)
Robert Priddy (using the name “ProEdits) responded with the following comment:
Editors, please note how Moreno replies to a question with a derogatory diatribe and an assertion of “madness! Who is most obsessed with propaganda, Andries or Moreno, is as clear as day to those who read even a fraction of the endless Morenos’ web pages and postings and the comparatively very few by Andries.–ProEdits 14:16, 6 September 2006 (UTC)” (Reference)
This is yet another blatant lie by Robert Priddy (aka “ProEdits) about me. I did not make that comment and had nothing to do with it whatsoever. Robert Priddy jumped to conclusions a prirori and defamed me with his unsupported, erroneous and spiteful accusations.
This from someone who claims he is a scholar, knows how to research his facts and that he is honest and truthful. I think the facts show otherwise. Just more proof that Robert Priddy can’t get his facts right even though the truth is right there in front of his nose.
Priddy now owes Lisa De Witt one more apology and owes me two.