SATHYA SAI BABA

DECEPTIVE NEWS ABOUT SATHYA SAI BABA ON ANTI-SAI WEBSITES

Refuting Deceptive News About Sathya Sai Baba Published On Anti-Sai Websites - On SaiSathyaSai.com

Refuting Deceptive 'News' About Bhagavan Sri Sathya Sai Baba Released On Anti-Sai Websites

APRIL 2006

A Visual Guide:

TRUE OR MOSTLY TRUE - The Article Is True Or Mostly True And Seems Sincere.
TRUTHS MIXED WITH UNTRUTHS - The Article Has Truths And Untruths And Seems Insincere.
FALSE OR UNSUBSTANIATED - The Article Is False And Has No Proof To Support It.
FLUFF - The Article Is Fluff, Filler Stuff, Not Relevant.

SATHYA SAI BABA NEWS (With Updates And Comments):

NEWS: April 1st 2006 Update:

The largest Anti-Sai Site on the world wide web, hetnet.nl/~exbaba, is now fully associating itself with the Evangelical Christian Site pastoraat-sos.nl (posting a full-sized banner on all their main pages). After many years of suppressing their Fundamentalist Christian ties, the truth now comes out. Click Here to read my article about the Christian Anti-Sai/Hindu movements.

NEWS: April 11th 2006 Update:

After making the comment above, the exbaba site removed the full-sized banners to the Evangelical Christian Site pastoraat-sos.nl (Reference). More cover-ups and deception from the Exbaba administration.

FLUFF - Supreme Court upheld Swami Premananda's life sentence for rape and murder
http://home.hetnet.nl/~ex_baba/engels/shortnews/premanandasentence.html
Comment: This article has absolutely nothing to do with Sathya Sai Baba. This article is about the Indian Supreme Court's decision to uphold the convictions made against Swami Premananda, despite the recanting of sexual abuse allegations by alleged victims and the testimony of Dr. Wall (a world-renown DNA expert) who claimed that the DNA evidence against Swami Premananda was fabricated from start to finish.

Strangely enough, this article is making the case that India's judicial system is fair and honest, even in dealing with high-ranking and well known Gurus. Robert Priddy (an Anti-Sai Activist) said, "Supposed 'religious figures' get convicted and imprisoned in Indian courts for sex offences and murder. Their devotees, however, invariably insist that their gurus could not possibly be guilty and the trials must have been unfair, fixed, or due to political repression and so on. Unfair High Court convictions probably do occur, but hardly in more than a few instances" (Reference). In this instance, Priddy argues for the integrity and fairness of India's judicial system. However, when it comes to Sathya Sai Baba, Priddy (and other Anti-Sai Activists) argue the exact opposite, whining about India's judicial system being "legally corrupt" and saying they could never have justice because the trials would be unfair, fixed or manipulated due to political repression, etc.!

The years keep passing and with each passing year Anti-Sai Activist's absolute failure to make any leeway against Sathya Sai Baba, in a court of law, is even more pronounced. When asked why they have not filed a court case against Sathya Sai Baba, Anti-Sai Activists whine about the corruption in the Indian Judicial System. Then they flip-flop and start posting articles likes these, praising the integrity of the Indian Judicial System! This type of duplicitous behavior is common among Anti-Sai Activists. Their views are wholly inconsistent and their positions continually change to accommodate whatever whim suits them in any given moment. This leaves Anti-Sai Activists looking very silly and confused.

FLUFF - 5 Cars and 5 Questions
http://home.hetnet.nl/~ex_baba/engels/articles/sergueicars.html
Comment: This is an article by Serguei Badaev. He is wondering why Sathya Sai Baba gave cars to 5 long term devotees and criticizes Baba's actions. What Anti-Sai Activists fail to realize is that the five individuals who were given cars have devoted their entire life to Sai Baba and spend most of their time serving others. I personally met some of these individuals and they are well known for their unremitting acts of selfless service. They are well respected individuals who are people of solid character and abiding integrity (wish the same could be said of Anti-Sai Activists: Reference). These individuals were rewarded for their selfless service and good acts by Sai Baba. Anti-Sai Activists have nothing better to do than to engage in petty criticism about cars that Sathya Sai Baba gave to people who deserved them.

FLUFF - Further Cover-Ups by the Australian Sathya Sai Organisation
http://home.no.net/anir/Sai/saiorg/Ozpages.htm
Comment: This is an amusing article written by Robert Priddy. In a seizure of over-emotionalism (and typical Anti-Sai paranoia), Priddy tried to make the case that an Australian Sai website engaged in some sort of covert, top-secret and clandestine mission to "cover-up" an article they published in 2003 and recently purged from their old files!

Sticking his foot further into his mouth, Priddy criticized the publishing of Barry Pittard's address on the internet, by T. Ramanathan. Priddy said (about Pittard's address), "one which any citizen has a right to keep private if he or she wishes". However, when it comes to me, Priddy and Anti-Sai Activists demand that I supply them with my full name, full address and full phone number of I am not who I say I am. As a matter of fact, Reinier Van Der Sandt published my full address (on his now-deleted website against me) and Priddy never complained about this whatsoever. Apparently, the only people who are allowed to maintain their privacy are Anti-Sai Activists. Everyone else must abide by separate standards. Heil Priddy!