Refuting Deceptive 'News' About Bhagavan Sri Sathya Sai Baba Released On Anti-Sai Websites
MARCH 2007
A Visual Guide:
- The Article Is True Or Mostly True And Seems Sincere.
- The Article Has Truths And Untruths And Seems Insincere.
- The Article Is False And Has No Proof To Support It.
- The Article Is Fluff, Filler Stuff, Not Relevant.
SATHYA SAI BABA NEWS (With Updates And Comments):
NEW ARTICLE: March 2007 Update:
- Page About Prashanti Nilayam, Puttaparthi Ashram
- Sathya Sai takes to threatening and lies about his critics taking money
http://home.hetnet.nl/~ex_baba/engels/articles/saitakeslies.html
Comment: This is a hysterical rant from Robert Priddy in which he garbled with flared nostrils about Sathya Sai Baba's recent discourse. Priddy frothed-at-the-mouth at the section where Baba said:
"However, some people out of egoistic envy are fabricating some stories about Me and publishing them in the newspapers. They are resorting to false propaganda about Me in the print and electronic media. All this does not perturb Me. I am not afraid of anybody. My very name is Sathyam Sathyam Sathyam (Truth). I am bound by truth. The name of this body is Sathyam (Truth). I will never stray away from the path of truth. Persons indulging in vituperative publicity impelled by envy, greed or hatred will reap the appropriate consequence. The time has come when proper action has to be taken to dissuade these people from resorting to such false propaganda. Of course, they are also not to be blamed. They are resorting to such false propaganda for the sake of money. They must try to realise their mistake..."
Robert Priddy called Sathya Sai Baba a liar and interpreted Baba's comments as a "threat". What is amusing about this is that when Baba claimed critics are being paid to disseminate their propaganda (an entirely viable scenario considering that Conny Larsson is a self-professed multi-millionaire who was accused by the Zimnicki twins of attempting to bribe them with money to lie about Sai Baba) Priddy throws one of his typical, flaming hissy fits. Strange enough, Priddy happened to engage in this very same behavior by accusing me (without any proof whatsoever) of being "well funded" and being the "internet spokesperson for defence of the entire International Sai Organisation".
It is nothing less than blatant hypocrisy for Robert Priddy to castigate Sathya Sai Baba for engaging in behavior that he fully engages in himself. Poor Robert Priddy! The only time he opens his mouth is stick his other foot in it.
NEW BLOGGED ARTICLES: March 2007 Update:
- Robert Priddy's Drug Experiences Revived
NEW BLOGGED ARTICLE: March 2007 Update:
- Robert Priddy's Penchant For Prevarication
NEW ARTICLE: March 2007 Update:
- Ekantik's (aka Sanjay Dadlani) Bogus Credentials On Wikipedia
NEW ARTICLE: March 2007 Update:
- 'Westminster Time Files' Book By Tony O'Clery
NEW BLOGGED ARTICLE: March 2007 Update:
- Tony O'Clery Caught Posting As "Sucked By Baba"
NEW BLOGGED ARTICLE: March 2007 Update:
- Barry Pittard: "We Do Not Slur"
NEW ARTICLE: March 2007 Update:
- Aoclery - Anthony Tony O'Clery Vandalizes The Sathya Sai Baba Wikipedia Article
NEW BLOGGED ARTICLE: March 2007 Update:
- Tony O'Clery's Reckless Defamations Continue
- Will Sai Baba Keep Hal Honig Smiling?
http://home.hetnet.nl/~ex_baba/engels/articles/barryhonig.html
Comment: An article duplicated from Barry Pittard's Anti-Sai Conspiracy blog (where he tells his pathological lies unabashedly and refuses to correct his bold-faced lies even when publicly scolded about them).
In true hypocritical fashion, Anti-Sai Activists think they are perfectly entitled to wage ad hominem attacks against Sai devotees (in this case, Hal Honig - replete with his picture). Nevertheless, when I expose them for their lies, deceit and dishonesty, they froth at the mouth and throw shrieking temper-tantrums accusing me of engaging in ad hominem attacks. It never ceases to amuse me how ex-devotees miserably fail to follow the same standards they demand of Pro-Sai Activists, including me.