|
I know this is not going to surprise most of us, but I caught Sanjay Dalani in yet another lie. Here are the details:
Dadlani defected from Sathya Sai Baba in May/June 2001 (as documented on the
sathyasaibabadiscussionclub). In September 2001 (AFTER becoming an Anti-Sai
Activist), Dadlani made the following claims on QuickTopic.com (about a list of
names, to Sai students, that were allegedly sexually abused by Sathya Sai Baba):
"The very fact that these three brothers are on this list fills me with
laughter. I know this family very well and they are at a loss to explain why
their names appear on this fabricated list. These Bharwani brothers who I
personally know also verified that many other names on the list are totally
false and were NEVER molested or in any way 'intimately conected' with Sai Baba.
and I am awaiting the complete list of names (or non-names) from them. I
personally believe that on the testimony of the Bharwani brothers that the
entire list is fabricated, but in any case if this list is reposted in this or
any other forum, I would like it if these three names were struck off from the
list, as it has offended the family very much"
Reading the above comment, Dadlani explicitly claimed:
1) He knew the family "very well";
2) He DIRECTLY discussed the issue, of their names being on the list, with them
- "they are at a loss to explain why their names appear on this fabricated
list";
3) He spoke DIRECTLY to the Bharwani Brothers and they PERSONALLY denied they
were molested by Sathya Sai Baba - "These Bharwani brothers who I personally
know also verified that many other names on the list are totally false and were
NEVER molested or in any way 'intimately conected' with Sai Baba." & "I
personally believe that on the testimony of the Bharwani brothers that the
entire list is fabricated."
NOW, however, the following was published on Premanand's response to me:
"Sanjay Dadlani left SSB some years ago and has now firmly repudiated that he
actually knew that three students were not abused, but fondly believed it then
only because he knew some female members of the family."
Therefore, NOW, Dadlani is claiming: 1) That he did NOT know the Bharwani
Brothers "personally" or the Bharwani family "very well", but only knew
(allegedly) some female members in the family; 2) That he did NOT speak to the
Bharwani Brothers; 3) That he did NOT obtain their "testimony", when originally
he claimed he did; 4) That the Bharwani Family NEVER expressed any opinion or
concern about their names being on the list and 5) Dadlani never talked to them
directly about it!
Consequently, Dadlani either LIED when he wrote his comment on QuickTopic.com
or is LYING now. Either way, Sanjay Dadlani lied and is a pathological, habitual
and chronic liar.
***************************
Anthony O'Clery, you never answered my former questions: Did Dadlani LIE about
you molesting people and being banned by the Vancouver Center for molestation?
Or was Dadlani telling the truth? WHY would Dadlani make that accusation against
you when he personally claimed he had a first-hand "informant"?
|
|
Offline