 |
PSYCHOLOGIST ÅSA SAMSIOE |  |
From: Joe (October 22nd 2008)
Subject: Conny Larsson
To: Åsa Samsioe
http://www.saisathyasai.com/Conny_Larsson/asa-samsioe-psychologist-leksand-sweden.html
Happy Reading
Sincerely,
Joe
|
RESPONSE FROM ÅSA SAMSIOE | |
From: Åsa Samsioe (October 23rd 2008)
Subject: Your mail
To: Joe
Hi Joe!
Why did you choose those ugly pictures of me?
I would prefer this one from 2007… Would you like to have some pictures of my parrot Sture and my husband and children to?
Yours truly
Åsa Samsioe
P.S I don’t understand how you can manage any more to go on like you do...
|
RESPONSE TO ÅSA SAMSIOE | |
From: Joe (October 23rd 2008)
Subject: Re: Your mail
To: Åsa Samsioe
Sure. Why not?
Sincerely,
Joe
|
RESPONSE FROM ÅSA SAMSIOE | |
From: Åsa Samsioe (October 23rd 2008)
Subject: Sture
To: Joe
Hi,
I think I have changed my mind about my husband and children. Probably they would not like if I send pictures of them to strangers.
But here is a picture of Sture anyway...
Yours Åsa Samsioe
(picture of parrot “Sture” attached)
|
RESPONSE TO ÅSA SAMSIOE | |
From: Joe (October 24th 2008)
Subject: Re: Sture
To: Åsa Samsioe
Dear Åsa Samsioe,
I believe you are avoiding the real discussion. Do you or do you not believe in psychics, trance mediums and psychic healers? What is your opinion about people who claim to hear spirit voices in their heads? What is your opinion about people who claim to see and converse with dead people?
I am curious what you truly believe regarding these issues because it appears you attempt to portray yourself as a logical, intelligent and rational individual not given to superstitious beliefs.
Sincerely,
Joe
|
RESPONSE FROM ÅSA SAMSIOE | |
From: Åsa Samsioe (October 26th 2008)
Subject: Real discussion?
To: Joe
Hi Joe,
You ask me why I avoid a “real discussion” with you. This time I will be honest to you! The answer is that any discussion is futile as our starting points are incompatible.
I know what I know and you are stuck in a belief system which makes every dialogue or “real discussion” impossible.
Like other sect leaders your guru has formed a waterproof doctrine, where every form of analytical thought or criticism against what he says or does is taboo, as he is infallible. What is then left to discuss?
But surely I have my own thoughts about your motives to contact former devotees like me. I can imagine several causes to this behavior.
If you think you are able to convert me or make me regret anything, according to your guru, you are quite wrong.
If you hope that I will write anything, in a personal mail to you, that you can use or misuse or distort as you prefer, you underestimate me.
But do you know what I think about your motives?
I think that deep in your mind, on a subconscious level, you have your own doubts that your guru is what he says he is.
This is very painful and to suppress those inner torturing doubts, you have to prove to yourself and the world that the ex devotees are dishonest hypocrites, nuts and fools.
Besides, if you use us as scapegoats, it is green light to release the inner pressure and direct your own critical thoughts and doubts towards a harmless goal, as your guru is prohibited zone.
This behavior even has a name. It’s called “displacement” and is a well known defense mechanism.
If you believe that your “god” is what he says he is, why do you think he needs your help to be defended from people like me? Why do you make all those efforts to write to me and other ex devotees? Don’t you ever get enough?
I am sure that if your guru should have been what you want him to be, he would not have appreciated your efforts! I think you just make a fool of yourself and him!
Now when you know my standpoint, I have no need at all to continue the discussion with you. Any discussion would just be destructive for both of us, taking time and energy to no use. But surely I also wish you happiness and some peace of mind at last!
Yours truly,
Åsa Samsioe
|
RESPONSE TO ÅSA SAMSIOE | |
From: Joe (October 26th 2008)
Subject: Re: Real discussion?
To: Åsa Samsioe
Dear Asa,
Thank you for your free psychological profiling. You will be disappointed to know that you are way off target. Probably because you never inquired about my beliefs or my views before you erroneously and prematurely judged me based on what you think I believe. Not very professional, intelligent or mature, in my opinion.
It certainly appears that you and ex-devotees suffer from “displacement” when it comes to pseudo-gurus like Conny Larsson who you defend, promote and endorse. I guess self-proclaimed prophets who claim they can contact dead people and hear dead people’s voices in their heads are more honest and more believable than Indian Gurus? This is the amusing argument you have made by refusing to speak out against self-proclaimed prophets, psychic healers and trance mediums like Conny Larsson.
Let us turn the tables:
It is apparent that by defending trance mediums like Conny Larsson, on a subconscious level you have doubts deep in your mind about Ex-Devotees and alleged victims. This must be very painful and tormenting for you to realize, so you suppress your subconscious doubts by blindly defending Ex-Devotees and alleged victims without questioning their integrity or crediblity so that you can perpetuate your unsupported beliefs that Sathya Sai Baba is a charlatan, fraud, sexual abuser, etc.
This behavior of yours is a perfect example of “displacement” and the “apostate syndrome” and well known defense mechanisms used by ex-devotees.
Needless to say, ex-devotee’s (including youself) refusal to say one word about psychic healer & self-proclaimed prophet Conny Larsson (although Ex-Devotee’s trash and bash other mediums and channelers as “absurd charlatans”) makes you all appear like a cadre of laughable fools!
Have a good day.
Sincerely,
Joe
|
RESPONSE FROM ÅSA SAMSIOE | |
From: Åsa Samsioe (November 1st 2008)
Subject: Re: Real discussion?
To: Joe
Hi Joe!
Sorry that I misunderstood your beliefs and views!
I thought that you were a devotee of Sathya Sai Baba, especially owing to your emotional commitment and your e-mail adress but also owing to the three monkeys with the SSB- emblem, if I remember your first e-mail right. (I have not saved it because my old computer crashed. Can it be the monkeys I should blame for this? Anyway please don’t send them to me again!)
According to your mail I understand that you must be an intelligent person, with a great analytic ability. Now when you have made clear to me that I was wrong when I thought you believe in SSB, I feel very curious about what you think about him and his claim to be God. Those persons must be just too much for thoughtful men like you! From your point of view SSB must knock out even Conny!
If you please share your doubts and your critical thoughts about SSB with me, perhaps I will answer your questions and share my thoughts with you.
Yours
Åsa Samsioe
P.S. Why just “Joe”? Will you please send me your last name and other credentials, if you want me to go on with this little chat.
|
RESPONSE TO ÅSA SAMSIOE | |
From: Joe (November 1st 2008)
Subject: Re: Real discussion?
To: Åsa Samsioe
Dear Asa,
Please do not play dumb with me. Just about every single webpage on my website (including my webpage about you, which I sent you) has my full name on the bottom of the page. Could it be that you have not read any of the webpages on my website, including the one I wrote about you?
All of your questions indicate that the only person “monkeying” around is you. This, of course, does not surprise me as you cannot even answer the basic question about whether or not self-proclaimed prophet, psychic trance medium and spirit channeler Conny Larsson is more genuine and truthful than Indian Gurus. Well, is he?
Since an educated person like yourself apparently lacks the capacity to conduct basic research, let me direct you to my FAQ’s page. And yes, my name is located on the bottom of that page as well. I suggest you look for it and (if you know how) click on it for more information.
Sincerely,
Joe
|
RESPONSE FROM ÅSA SAMSIOE | |
From: Åsa Samsioe (November 2nd 2008)
Subject: Re: Real discussion?
To: Joe
Hi Joe,
Why would I be interested to read your website or take my time and effort to do research on you? You overrate your own importance and my interest in your person!
And your beliefs and views are still hidden in a smoke screen; a devotee to Sathya Sai Baba who is not a devotee in the proper sense!
But who cares really!
You want me to answer your questions but you don’t answer mine. And surely I am not interested to surf your website to perhaps find the answers somewhere.
You want to be the one who lay down conditions for the communication which actually is no communication at all. The only thing you do when I answer your mails is to send me new invectives.
As I wrote before, I have no need for this pseudo communication with you; it is all your need and the motives for this are still hidden in the dark. Therefore this is my last answer to you.
You don’t need to take efforts to answer this mail from me, because I will not take efforts to answer still more mumbo jumbo mails from you.
Yours
Åsa Samsioe
|
RESPONSE TO ÅSA SAMSIOE | |
From: Joe (November 2nd 2008)
Subject: Re: Real discussion?
To: Åsa Samsioe
Dear Asa,
So the truth finally comes out. You ask me all sorts of questions about my beliefs and who I am. You misrepresented my beliefs and views about Sathya Sai Baba (due to your erroneous judgmentalism). Now you admit you have not read my website and you do not care to conduct even basic research into my beliefs or views. This speaks volumes about your character and so-called dedication to the truth. Thank you for being honest about your apathy.
Once before, you stated that you were not going to continue this discussion with me and that any further discussion would be “destructive” to both of us. Now, several replies later, you are telling me again that you are not going to answer my emails and that I “overrate” my importance and your interest with me. If this is true, then why do you continue to respond to my emails? Especially if I am no interest to you? If you truly wish to cease this communication, I suggest you stop writing me. It’s that simple.
Your beliefs are the only ones shrouded in darkness. At least I have openly stated what my beliefs are on my website. You, on the other hand, are going to great extents to suppress your beliefs by refusing to answer one question about your views on the integrity and credibility of psychic trance mediums like Conny Larsson. I strongly suspect you are a true-believer in psychics and that is why you adamantly refuse to say one word against them.
Since you are the person who has failed to conduct any research, has failed to lift one finger to read my website and has failed to answer pertinent questions, the “pseudo-communication” you made reference to is due to your failure only.
Have a good day.
Sincerely,
Joe
|
ÅSA SAMSIOE - IN CONCLUSION | |
In Conclusion, Asa Samsioe adamantly refused to say one word against psychics, trance mediums, spirit channelers and aura readers like Conny Larsson. Asa Samsioe fervently believes Conny Larsson and his allegations against Sathya Sai Baba. So fervently, in fact, that she wrote a book review praising Conny Larsson and endorsed him as a man of integrity and credibility.
Nevertheless, when direct questions were posed to Asa Samsioe about the integrity and credibility of psychic trance mediums (which Conny Larsson claims to be), she went completely mum on the issue and made every conceivable attempt to deflect away from the issue.
These are the typcial types of evasive and laughable replies given by Ex-Devotees to defend members of their coterie who have been exposed for their fraudulence, perversions and ridiculous psychic posturing. These facts further my original contention: “...suggesting that anger, rather than genuine grievances, are driving the Anti-Sai Campaign”.