RANDI GODAGER

From: Randi Godager (October 2nd 2004)
Subject: Swami’s defenders
To: Visvarupa

I have been forwarded the mail you sent to Priddy, an upstanding, fearless man and well known for it in his country where there are real values, decency and no corruption from bottom to top. I agree with his views and writings fully.

The petition is not for the benefit of spammers like yourself and friends - it is perfectly obvious to anyone but you lot that it not a discussion forum and not not an organisation for Sai propagandists. Its aim is solely to bring Sai Baba’s crimes to public attention with a view to bringing him to just and stopping him. People can express their views if they support it, yes! You can go elsewhere and express yours, but only Sai dupes will actually take them seriously. IN SHORT, NO PROBLEMS FOR THE ANTI-SAI PETITION - IT IS ONLY YOU AND FRIENDS WHO HAVE ALL THE PROBLEMS WITH IT.

I know that the JuST group engages in two-way communication but NOT within the petition... and anyhow Sai devotees are unable to communicate with anyone who does not share the same delusions as them, proven time and time again. Goldstein never answers any letters, nor any ooffice-bearer in the Sai Org. They are all too scared that their foolish and proto-criminal views will incriminate them in future! The cult has closed down on the ‘outside world’. All Sai people live in a mental and social cocoon, can only get on with like-minded. It is a state of mental derangement common in authoritarian cults with plenty to hide, known as ‘true believer syndrome’, a significant precursor to future trouble in the real world!

For your information, this is feedback communication now, right here, and I am telling you that you are the dupe of a sex abuser of rank, proven bare-faced liar, user of sleight-of-hand to give shop-bought objects of very little value, an accomplice to murder and its cover-up, a sheer ignoramus on the sciences (atoms, magnetism and much more besides), a shameless boaster and seeker of fame and name and a major manipulator of all people without exception etc. etc.. I have many years of full involvement with him behind me, but I got close in and FOUND OUT, whic a relative outsider like yourself cannot do without effort and much honesty.

We here (in Norway) also know very well one person who was forced into oral sex by Sai Baba in the 1970s, who only told about it recently after many years of sufferings. I also know another person who was made to engage in oral sex with Sai Baba for a long period who lives in an adjacent country to mine. I know a number who were sexually molested otherwise. Perhaps you and your young friends were involved sexually too, we know there are very many who are or were and there is a one in five chance of being a homosexual at least? I know you are relatively young, which is also seen in how your web page is simplistic and inconsistent, obviously biassed for all to see.

I think the administrators of Public Petition will have some message for you on the old petition site. In your desparation, you piddle around incorrectly with incorrect details which do not conceal the fact that many people have very bad experiences of Sai Baba. The petition is fully legal too... you might like to challenge it in court? But neither you nor anyone else in the Sai crowd dares to do that, more’s the pity!

Goodbye, Vishwarupa (I don’t think that is your real name, you are just scared to come out with it, eh?)

Randi Godager

RESPONSE TO RANDI GODAGER

From: Visvarupa (October 2nd 2004)
Subject: Re: Swami’s defenders
To: Randi Godager

Randi, thank you for your email. Actually, before having corresponded with Mr. Priddy, I truly felt like he was one of the very few who actually strived for honesty and accuracy in his accounts. Sadly, after his correspondence with me, I must say that I no longer hold that view. Did he forward his correspondence to you as well? Please ask him to.

Randi, you said, “The petition is not for the benefit of spammers like yourself and friends...” However, how are YOU able to discern who is spamming and who isn’t? Remember, spamming can be done by BOTH pro-Sai and anti-Sai activists. It is fairly easy to eliminate the pro-Sai elements. I have already shown how 13 posts, using different names, that are Anti-Sathya Sai Baba, have uncanny and amazing similarities on the petition. I have also shown that there are duplicate posts, altered posts and 24 ADDED posts. Why does none of this concern you? If you are a fighter for justice and a firm believer in truth, honesty and sincerity, WHY are you not enquiring into the discrepancies I have pointed out? Why are you not concerned with the potential for abuse by anti-Sai spammers?

And Thank You, Randi, for saying the Petition IS Legal. Since it is your assertion that the Petition IS Legal, you obviously have talked to a lawyer about it. Please provide me with any legal documentation you may have to support your claim that the petition is legal. If you do not want to provide me with the legal information that states your online petition is legal, please post it on your site. I am amazed you have not done so thus far! Fair is Fair. That would greatly further the veracity of your claims. Don’t you agree?

Since you must know, of course, that legal petitions must have verifiable information, how do you verify the submissions on the petition? The mere fact I was able to post multiple times, without any sort of verification process, points to a serious loophole. Perhaps your lawyer can also help explain how this loophole is covered? How do you verify the submissions?

And regarding my name, it is clearly posted at the bottom of the pages I made. Perhaps you did not even care to read the entire page? My name is Gerald ‘Joe’ Moreno.

Thank You.

Sincerely,

~Joe

RESPONSE FROM RANDI GODAGER

From: Randi Godager (October 3rd 2004)
Subject: your mail was unopened & all will be blocked out from now
To: Visvarupa

Randi Godager

RANDI GODAGER - IN CONCLUSION

In Conclusion, Anti-Sai Activists react with judgmentalism, anger, bitterness and hate when they are questioned about their deception and deceit. Although critics demand honesty, sincerity and truthfulness from others, when they are questioned about the inherent dishonesty of their online petition they are all of a sudden beyond reproach (ironically, a stance they find repulsive with the Sai Organization).

Strangely enough, Randi Godager’s name is not listed anywhere on any Anti-Sai website and his email address (anir@start.no) resolves to Robert Priddy’s home.no.net/anir/Sai Anti-Sai domain.

It is also ironic that Randi Godager questioned my sexual involvement with Sai Baba. Leo Rebello questioned Robert Priddy’s sexual involvement with Sai Baba and Priddy found Rebello’s speculations to be outrageous and unconscionable. Randi Godager (an alleged friend of Robert Priddy) insinuated that “perhaps” I had sexual relations with Sathya Sai Baba. These are the sexually focused and deviant “Just Seekers of Truth”.

• Information And Facts About Robert Priddy