Wikipedia Evidence Section For 'Andries'
Deception By User:Andries on Wikipedia:
As the current scope of ArbCom is about POV and COI, I will simply cite what I cited in the first ArbCom case about Andries. Andries was the former webmaster (for 3 years) and is the current "Main Representative, Supervisor and Contact" for the largest Anti-Sathya-Sai-Baba website on the internet: View Previous ArbCom Evidence Page.
On July 27th 2005: M Alan Kazlev made specific mention to Andries webmaster status (Ref) → In the very next post (same day), Andries did not deny being the webmaster, but instead solicited a link to his personal defection story ([48]) → Dec. 6th 2005: Thaumaturgic attributed the hetnet.nl/~exbaba site to Reinier and Andries ([49]) → Dec. 6th 2005: Andries removed his name but left Reiniers ([50]) → Very next day, Dec. 7th 2006 (4 months after Kazlev brought up this issue with no denial from Andries, Andries claimed he was not the webmaster but Reinier was the webmaster ([51]). Why the "real" webmaster would list Andries as the webmaster for one week (an unnecessary action for such a short period of time), yet fail to update this information for 3 years (when the site was being updated with hundreds of articles during that time) is a question Andries refused (and continues to refuse) to answer [52]. I emailed Reinier with the same questions posed to Andries [53] and he never responded to the questions either.
I created a page about Andries animosity toward Sathya Sai Baba in the previous ArbCom dispute: View Previous ArbCom Evidence Page
In an effort to build good faith and prevent edit warring, I created a proposition on the Sathya Sai Baba talk page [54] that was signed by all of the involved editors, except Andries. Andries initially disagreed and attacked me [55], then partially agreed [56], attacked me again [57] and refuses to agree to the same proposition all the other editors agreed to. This suggests that Andries is unwilling to cooperate with other editors and is adamant that the article should be shaped according to his views.
Andries was banned from editing the Robert Priddy article for one month [58] due to violating the ArbCom ruling and two warnings from Admin [59][60] because of the following contentious edits: [61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68]. Once again, this suggests that Andries is unwilling to accept the ArbCom ruling and the warnings of two Admin and will push forward with his Anti-Sai agenda at any cost. Needless to say, Andries still believes he is right and ArbCom and Admin are wrong [69].
Andries, Reinier van der Sandt, Ekantik, M Alan Kazlev and Robert Priddy are all collaborators and Andries Anti-Sai Site frequently publishes Priddy's Anti-Sai material, the most recent being December 12th 2006 [70] (which even included a personal attack against me) and frequently publishes Ekantik's Anti-Sai material and even devoted a link to him (entitled "Dadlani") on the menu bar [71] → Update. In my opinion, this is why Andries is so intent on including Priddy's Anti-Sai website on Priddy's wiki-page. Andries has an Anti-Sai agenda to push.